“…Opposed to these results, Kremer et al (2004) reported that female lambs had higher dressing percentage than males and ascribed such superiority to a higher fat deposition in the carcass. Khaldari et al (2007) found no significant effect of lamb's genotype on cold carcass percentage, but opposite to our finding, they observed no significant difference between male and female lambs for cold carcass percentage. El Fadili et al (2001) also reported that dressing percentage between purebred and crossbred lambs was not significant.…”
Section: Carcass Conformationcontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…They also found significant difference between male and female lambs in terms of SLW and CCW, which are in agreement with our results. Khaldari et al (2007) reported that there was no significant difference between SLW and CCW of purebred and crossbred lambs. They also found a significant difference between male and female lambs for SLW and CCW that agree with our findings in the study herein.…”
A crossbreeding experiment was carried out to determine the sire breed effects on fattening performance of fat-tailed lambs. Rams from four Iranian fat-tailed sheep breeds, namely Kurdi (K), Afshari (A), Chaal (C) and Sanjabi (S) were mated to Kurdi ewes producing 454 progeny of four genotype groups (KK, AK, CK and SK). A total of 80 lambs comprising ten female and ten male lambs from each genotype group were used in a fattening experiment during a period of 88 days. Genotype of the lamb had significant effect on average dry matter intake (ADMI) (P < 0.05). SK lambs had the lowest ADMI. Average daily gain (ADG) and food conversion ratio (FCR) were not influenced by genotype of the lamb. Sex of the lamb had significant effect on both ADG and FCR (P < 0.01). Slaughter weight (SLW), hot carcass weight (HCW), cold carcass weight (CCW) and daily carcass gain (DCG) were not affected by lamb's genotype. However, genotype had significant effect on dressing percentage, carcass loss percentage (P < 0.01), carcass length (CL), leg circumference (LC), carcass compactness (CC) (P < 0.01) and carcass density (CD) (P < 0.05). Carcass width (CW) and leg length (LL) were not affected by lamb's genotype. Sex of the lamb had significant effects on CL, CW, LC, CC, CD (P < 0.01) and LL (P < 0.05). The results indicated the existence of sire breed difference for daily dry matter intake and carcass conformation in the fat-tailed sheep.
“…Opposed to these results, Kremer et al (2004) reported that female lambs had higher dressing percentage than males and ascribed such superiority to a higher fat deposition in the carcass. Khaldari et al (2007) found no significant effect of lamb's genotype on cold carcass percentage, but opposite to our finding, they observed no significant difference between male and female lambs for cold carcass percentage. El Fadili et al (2001) also reported that dressing percentage between purebred and crossbred lambs was not significant.…”
Section: Carcass Conformationcontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…They also found significant difference between male and female lambs in terms of SLW and CCW, which are in agreement with our results. Khaldari et al (2007) reported that there was no significant difference between SLW and CCW of purebred and crossbred lambs. They also found a significant difference between male and female lambs for SLW and CCW that agree with our findings in the study herein.…”
A crossbreeding experiment was carried out to determine the sire breed effects on fattening performance of fat-tailed lambs. Rams from four Iranian fat-tailed sheep breeds, namely Kurdi (K), Afshari (A), Chaal (C) and Sanjabi (S) were mated to Kurdi ewes producing 454 progeny of four genotype groups (KK, AK, CK and SK). A total of 80 lambs comprising ten female and ten male lambs from each genotype group were used in a fattening experiment during a period of 88 days. Genotype of the lamb had significant effect on average dry matter intake (ADMI) (P < 0.05). SK lambs had the lowest ADMI. Average daily gain (ADG) and food conversion ratio (FCR) were not influenced by genotype of the lamb. Sex of the lamb had significant effect on both ADG and FCR (P < 0.01). Slaughter weight (SLW), hot carcass weight (HCW), cold carcass weight (CCW) and daily carcass gain (DCG) were not affected by lamb's genotype. However, genotype had significant effect on dressing percentage, carcass loss percentage (P < 0.01), carcass length (CL), leg circumference (LC), carcass compactness (CC) (P < 0.01) and carcass density (CD) (P < 0.05). Carcass width (CW) and leg length (LL) were not affected by lamb's genotype. Sex of the lamb had significant effects on CL, CW, LC, CC, CD (P < 0.01) and LL (P < 0.05). The results indicated the existence of sire breed difference for daily dry matter intake and carcass conformation in the fat-tailed sheep.
“…The animal's resources could be used to grow and yield carcasses more efficiently. Genetic selection against fat-tails (Kashan et al, 2005;M Khaldari & Tajic, 2006;Khaldari et al, 2008;Safdarian, Zamiri, Hashemi, & Noorolahi, 2008) and docking is also thought to be desirable for increasing IMF, and therefore, the organoleptic properties of lamb (Atti & Mahouachi, 2011;Bingol et al, 2006;Moharrery, 2007). However, a relationship between genetically selecting against fat-tails and docking, with improved organoleptic properties has not been demonstrated scientifically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Fat-tailed lambs store fat in their tail and they tend to have lower amounts of carcass and intramuscular fat (IMF) (Khaldari, Kashan, Afzalzadeh, & Salehi, 2008;Webb & O'Neill, 2008). This has been shown to adversely affect their eating quality (Hopkins, Hegarty, Walker, & Pethick, 2006;Farid et al, 1983;Fisher et al, 2000) as well as physical meat characteristics, such as color, drip loss and shear force (Nurnberg, Wegner, & Ender, 1998;Warner, Greenwood, Pethick, & Ferguson, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Many researchers have attempted to decrease (Atti & Mahouachi, 2011;Kashan et al, 2005;M Khaldari & Tajic, 2006;Khaldari et al, 2008) or remove the fat-tail of the traditional Iranian ewe breeds (Atti & Mahouachi, 2011;Bingol, Aygun, Gokdal, & Yılmaz, 2006;Moharrery, 2007), so that the animal's energy is not wasted putting resources into the tail. The animal's resources could be used to grow and yield carcasses more efficiently.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.