2018
DOI: 10.1093/jeg/lby041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth and agglomeration in the heterogeneous space: a generalized AK approach

Abstract: We provide an optimal growth spatio-temporal setting with capital accumulation and diffusion across space to study the link between economic growth triggered by capital spatio-temporal dynamics and agglomeration across space. The technology is AK, K being broad capital. The social welfare function is Benthamite. In sharp contrast to the related literature, which considers homogeneous space, we derive optimal location outcomes for any given space distributions for technology and population. Both the transitiona… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this review is concerned with environmental modeling, it is worth mentioning the strong nexus with the contemporaneous economic literature on spatial economic growth models. Typically, the latter involves the optimal control of production factors' spatio-temporal dynamics governed by a diffusion equation (see Brito [32], for the first attempt, and Boucekkine et al [29] for the ultimate one). Therefore, the two classes of models involve similar distributed control problems.…”
Section: Spatial Growth Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this review is concerned with environmental modeling, it is worth mentioning the strong nexus with the contemporaneous economic literature on spatial economic growth models. Typically, the latter involves the optimal control of production factors' spatio-temporal dynamics governed by a diffusion equation (see Brito [32], for the first attempt, and Boucekkine et al [29] for the ultimate one). Therefore, the two classes of models involve similar distributed control problems.…”
Section: Spatial Growth Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the involved diffusion state equations are PDEs instead of ODEs, an appropriate method has to be employed to tackle the original optimal control problem. To this end, we build on Bensoussan et al [6] (see also, for a recent related application in the spatio-temporal dynamics field, Boucekkine et al [8]) rewriting, by a semigroup approach, the controlled PDE state equation as a controlled ODE in a suitable infinite dimensional (Hilbert) space. Then we exploit the linear-quadratic structure of the problem and the tools of infinite dimensional optimal control theory to explicitly compute the value function, the optimal control/state trajectories and the long-run optimal state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With reference to them our method has some advantages 3 : (i) the assumptions on the cost structure are milder, notably they do not include any continuity assumption on the running cost that is only asked to be a measursimpler and there is not need to use the notion of ν-weak Dirichlet processes and and results that are specifically suited for the infinite dimensional case. In that case ν 0 will be isomorphic to the full space H. 3 Results for specific cases, as boundary control problems and reaction-diffusion equation (see [4,5]) cannot be treated at the moment with the method we present here. able function; moreover the admissible controls are only asked to verify, together with the related trajectories, a quasi-integrability condition of the functional, see Hypothesis 3.3 and the subsequent paragraph; (ii) we work with a bigger set of approximating functions because we do not require the approximating functions and their derivatives to be uniformly bounded; (iii) the convergence of the derivatives of the approximating solution is not necessary and it is replaced by the weaker condition (17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples where the optimal control distributes as an eigenvector of A * arise in applied examples, see for instance[3,15] for some economic deterministic examples. In the mentioned cases the operator A is elliptic and self-adjoint.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%