Growth and age of staghorn sculpins of the genus Gymnocanthus (Cottidae) in Peter the Great Bay and adjacent waters of Primorye (Sea of Japan)

Панченко, В. В.

doi:10.1134/s0032945212020117

Cited by 15 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The estimated PLDs for G. herzensteini and G. intermedius are reasonable because pelagic larvae appear in May in G. herzensteini and from April to June in G. intermedius in the Vostok Bay (Sokolovskaya et al ., ). On the other hand, G. tricuspis in the Arctic Ocean and the surrounding area stay in the pelagic phase for several months (Norvillo & Zhuraleva, ; Panchenko, ). The pelagic larvae of G. tricuspis are 12–39.7 mm in SL (Chiperzak et al ., ) and juveniles recruit at >25 mm SL (Gray et al ., ; Mecklenburg et al ., ), larger than most northern Pacific species in both hatch and settlement size (Figure ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…Increments along the hatch check, first feeding check and settlement mark were also counted. The inner checks are deposited during hatching (hatch check) and the outer checks are deposited during settlement (settlement check) (Panchenko, ; Ruzycki & Wurtsbaugh, ). In addition, the first‐feeding check is deposited when the exogenous feeding activity is initiated (Bolz & Lough, ;Bailey & Stehr, ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The larval growth and morphology during the larval stages were compared among G. tricuspis, G. herzensteini and G. intermedius. The hatch size, settle size and PLDs of other sculpins were cited from previous studies (Andryashev, 1964;Ehrenbaum, 1904;Geffen & Nash, 1992;Gray et al, 2017;Guan et al, 2008;Heufelder, 1982;Kyushin, 1970;Luksenburg et al, 2004;Mansfield et al, 1983;Marliave, 1986;Marliave et al, 2009;Matarese & Marliave, 1982;Norvillo & Zhuraleva, 1989;Panchenko, 2012;Pavlov et al, 1993;Shiogaki, 2014;Stein, 1973;von Dorrien, 1996;Walsh & Lund, 1983;Waples & Rosenblatt, 1987;Washington, 1981).…”

Section: Field Samplingmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Dispersion and settlement of two sympatric sculpins of the genus Gymnocanthus

Yamazaki

Ogino

Munehara

2020

Journal of Fish Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Larval dispersion rather than adult migration generally leads to the worldwide expansion of fishes. Species of the genus Gymnocanthus have expanded geographically while undergoing allopatric speciation. Of this genus, while Gymnocanthus tricuspis inhabits the Arctic Ocean and surrounding area, G. herzensteini and G. intermedius occur around northern Japan. Larval early life histories of G. herzensteini and G. intermedius from northern Japan and G. tricuspis from Unalaska Island were investigated to estimate their dispersal potential during larval stages. The larval and juvenile abundances of G. herzensteini and G. intermedius were highest in May in shallow sandy bottoms below 7 m in depth, and the body sizes were 9.7–34.6 mm notochord length (NL) and/or standard length (SL) in G. herzensteini and 8.4–46.7 mm NL and/or SL in G. intermedius. Two egg masses of G. tricuspis (1.92 ± 0.08 mm in diameter) and hatched larvae (6.20 ± 0.19 mm NL) were collected in March. Compared with other sculpins in previous studies, the body sizes of G. herzensteini and G. intermedius at hatch are large and at settlement are small, while both hatch and settlement sizes of G. tricuspis are much larger. Counting micro‐increments between the hatch check and settlement marks in G. herzensteini and G. intermedius demonstrated that the pelagic larval durations for 2 weeks with an immature body suggests that these species cannot disperse widely during the pelagic phase, while pelagic larvae of Arctic species such as G. tricuspis with long pelagic larval durations could disperse.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Field Samplingmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Dispersion and settlement of two sympatric sculpins of the genus Gymnocanthus

Yamazaki

Ogino

Munehara

2020

Journal of Fish Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The predominance of females among adult fishes might be explained by females living longer, as in other sculpins of the superfamily Cottoidea (TenBrink & Aydin, 2009;Panchenko, 2010Panchenko, , 2012C. A. M. Ottesen, unpubl.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Spawning in a cold bath: reproduction of polar and deep‐sea fish family Psychrolutidae

Laptikhovsky

Reid

Brickle

2016

Journal of Fish Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study describes the spawning of the fatheads Psychrolutes marmoratus and Cottunculus granulosus, two psychrolutid species that inhabit the shelf edge and continental slope of the south-west Atlantic. Females lay large eggs of c. 2·5 mm (P. marmoratus) and 4·5-5·0 mm (C. granulosus); fecundity is from the hundreds (C. granulosus) to a few thousand eggs (P. marmoratus). Egg maturation is synchronous in P. marmoratus with an autumn-winter peak of spawning and group-synchronous in C. granulosus, which reproduces all year round. In the fishery, females predominate among adult fish in both species, possibly indicating male nest guarding on hard grounds inaccessible to fishing vessels. The reproductive strategy of representatives of the Psychrolutidae is similar to that of other sculpins of the superfamily Cottoidea.

show abstract

“…It should also be taken into account that the updates continued to be published afterwards as well. For this reason, some of the data reported by the TINRO center scientists that broadened our knowledge on the species composition, sizes, distribution, and particularities of the biology of the fish inhabiting the Russian territorial waters of the Sea of Japan (Vdovin and Shvydkii, 2000;Ivankova, 2000;Panchenko 2002Panchenko , 2005Panchenko , 2009Panchenko , 2012Antonenko et al, 2003Antonenko et al, , 2010Antonenko et al, , 2011aAntonenko et al, , 2011bIvankova and Kim, 2004;Panchenko and Antonenko, 2004;Panchenko and Pushchina, 2004;Kalchugin et al, 2006;Balanov and Solomatov, 2008;Panchenko and Zuenko, 2009;Solomatov et al, 2009;Panchenko et al, 2011Balanov et al, 2012;Zemnukhov et al, 2013;Panchenko and Solomatov, 2014;Panchenko and Boiko, 2015) have not been included in the summary work. Apart from the already published data, in the TINRO center, there have been so far accumulated many materials which have not been used in any published works and which complement and broaden our knowledge on the above-mentioned subject.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%