2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.102139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growing socio-spatial inequality in neo-liberal times? Comparing Beijing and London

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, external forces have long been argued as critical forces of spatial polarization and urban inequality in developing countries (Kasarda & Crenshaw, 1991). Neoliberalism raises concerns about growing inequality; Shi and Dorling (2020), for example, uncover diverse patterns of inequality resulting from neoliberalism in Beijing and London, and call for considering local conditions (for example, speed of change) in global urban studies.…”
Section: Inter-urban Inequalities In Regional and Global Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, external forces have long been argued as critical forces of spatial polarization and urban inequality in developing countries (Kasarda & Crenshaw, 1991). Neoliberalism raises concerns about growing inequality; Shi and Dorling (2020), for example, uncover diverse patterns of inequality resulting from neoliberalism in Beijing and London, and call for considering local conditions (for example, speed of change) in global urban studies.…”
Section: Inter-urban Inequalities In Regional and Global Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level of population migration tends to have a different impact on household structure depending on whether the migration is an inflow or outflow. Due to the restrictions of China's household registration system, the floating population is usually of a working age (Shi and Dorling, 2020). In a typical emigration area, with an increase in people migrating out, the number of elderly one-person households, single-parent households, and skip-generation households increases, while the number of standard nuclear households decreases (Tang, 2020).…”
Section: Demographic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The economic crisis of 2008 intensified this process, redrawing the global map of inequalities [4] with serious consequences: in particular, on the housing market both as a financial asset [5] and as a primary good, with some countries particularly affected, such as Spain [6]. The consequences of the crisis have been exacerbated by deregulation and privatization policies that have led to cuts in social housing policies [7,8]. The social groups that have suffered most from housing insecurity are those who are already in a precarious situation to begin with: lowincome households [8][9][10][11]; ethnic minorities and migrants from third countries [12,13]; and those effected by internal displacements that have arisen from urbanization processes, as occurred in China [14,15].…”
Section: Introduction: Residential Segregation and Housing Insecurity...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consequences of the crisis have been exacerbated by deregulation and privatization policies that have led to cuts in social housing policies [7,8]. The social groups that have suffered most from housing insecurity are those who are already in a precarious situation to begin with: lowincome households [8][9][10][11]; ethnic minorities and migrants from third countries [12,13]; and those effected by internal displacements that have arisen from urbanization processes, as occurred in China [14,15]. These groups are subject to what Clark [16] described in 1986 as 'residential segregation', determined by significant levels of separation between black and white groups in major US cities, caused not only by economic factors, but also by the housing choices of individual groups.…”
Section: Introduction: Residential Segregation and Housing Insecurity...mentioning
confidence: 99%