2006
DOI: 10.5367/000000006779111648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growing Pains: The Sustainability of Social Enterprises

Abstract: This paper establishes the growing perception of the importance of the social enterprise sector in the UK, and notes that it is currently government policy to encourage growth. However, social enterprises, in common with many small businesses, find growth difficult, and this could impact negatively on their sustainability. The author goes on to explore the reasons for that difficulty, and concludes by suggesting how best to support social enterprise. It is suggested that orthodox growth stimulated by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other supply side of the equation, the capacity to meet these needs will be dependent upon the ability of the local populace (or incomers working on their behalf) to develop business skills and financial resources. Key individuals are often portrayed as the driving force behind SEs, and although such individuals are often crucial, these firms are rarely the product of the lone actions of a single ‘heroic’ individual (Seanor and Meaton 2007; Amin 2009); in addition, networks and infrastructural support are vital (Peattie and Morley 2006; Phillips 2006; Sharir and Lerner 2006; Thompson and Doherty 2006; Hynes 2009). Since SEs require such cooperation and voluntary activity to operate, one might expect them to flourish in areas with strong degrees of social capital (i.e.…”
Section: Conceptualising the Geography Of Social Enterprisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other supply side of the equation, the capacity to meet these needs will be dependent upon the ability of the local populace (or incomers working on their behalf) to develop business skills and financial resources. Key individuals are often portrayed as the driving force behind SEs, and although such individuals are often crucial, these firms are rarely the product of the lone actions of a single ‘heroic’ individual (Seanor and Meaton 2007; Amin 2009); in addition, networks and infrastructural support are vital (Peattie and Morley 2006; Phillips 2006; Sharir and Lerner 2006; Thompson and Doherty 2006; Hynes 2009). Since SEs require such cooperation and voluntary activity to operate, one might expect them to flourish in areas with strong degrees of social capital (i.e.…”
Section: Conceptualising the Geography Of Social Enterprisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent exceptions include Phillips (2006), Aiken (2010) and Woodin, Crook, and Carpentier (2010). However, researchers have access to a variety of historical methods that could be used to study the growth process in these hybrid organizations 11 .…”
Section: Historically-informed Approaches and The Methodology To Explmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social ownership involves the collaboration between governance and the community [21,75,76]. In the privity of contract, a number of business enterprises, other social enterprises, subcontractors, financial institutions, and social investors are included in the economic activity [77][78][79]. Furthermore, in collaborative relationships, social enterprise contains several NGOs, NPOs, local and central governments, residents, and the media in social activity [26,80,81].…”
Section: Social Enterprise and Social Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%