2006
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/39/9/004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growing networks with mixed attachment mechanisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar two-term growth equations were suggested by Refs. [13,29,35,36]. Equation 4 is formally identical to Eq.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar two-term growth equations were suggested by Refs. [13,29,35,36]. Equation 4 is formally identical to Eq.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of a wide range of network models is to provide a framework to understand how linkage mechanisms for establishing links give rise to particular topological properties, including degree distributions [4,9], clustering [33], average path lengths [1], and community partitions [26]. There has been a continuous and significant effort directed at formalizing such mechanisms and their role in the formation of networks like the Internet, the world wide web, and co-authorship associations [31,5,30,8,2,19,12,23,13,17,16,4,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two mechanisms combined yield a degree distribution that asymptotically follow a power law. If the growth mechanism is combined with a uniform random attachment mechanism, with no preference for nodes with a high degree, then the resulting network follows an exponential function [30]. However, a recent study shows that from nearly 1000 empirical networks less than 5% exhibit pure power law or exponential relationships [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attachment of new nodes results according to a uniform random distribution followed by the formation of triad junctions. Like [21] the formation mechanism in this paper does not instantiate the principle of preferential attachment, focusing on conditions that generate extended, rather than single, power law distributions [22], [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%