2007
DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2007-00208-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growing distributed networks with arbitrary degree distributions

Abstract: We consider distributed networks, such as peer-to-peer networks, whose structure can be manipulated by adjusting the rules by which vertices enter and leave the network. We focus in particular on degree distributions and show that, with some mild constraints, it is possible by a suitable choice of rules to arrange for the network to have any degree distribution we desire. We also describe a mechanism based on biased random walks by which appropriate rules could be implemented in practice. As an example applica… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is one of the simplest and most important attributes of a network node [7,8]. The degree of the node is the number of all edges connected to it.…”
Section: Curriculum Evaluation Of Degree Distribution Based On Degreementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is one of the simplest and most important attributes of a network node [7,8]. The degree of the node is the number of all edges connected to it.…”
Section: Curriculum Evaluation Of Degree Distribution Based On Degreementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is one of the simplest and most important attributes of a network node [10,11]. The degree of the node is the number of all edges connected to it.…”
Section: Curriculum Evaluation Of Degree Distribution Based On Degreementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13]. Thus for a network in which the maximum allowable degree M is small compared with the number of nodes N (i.e., M/N 1), self-loops and multiple links have negligible effect.…”
Section: Comparison With Stochastic Simulations That Disallow Multiplmentioning
confidence: 99%