Growing Disparities in Patient-Provider Messaging: Trend Analysis Before and After Supportive Policy

Abstract

BackgroundPublic policy introduced since 2011 has supported provider adoption of electronic medical records (EMRs) and patient-provider messaging, primarily through financial incentives. It is unclear how disparities in patients’ use of incentivized electronic health (eHealth) tools, like patient-provider messaging, have changed over time relative to disparities in use of eHealth tools that were not directly incentivized.ObjectiveThis study examines trends in eHealth disparities before and after the introduction of US federal financial incentives. We compare rates of patient-provider messaging, which was directly incentivized, with rates of looking for health information on the Web, which was not directly incentivized.MethodsWe used nationally representative Health Information National Trends Survey data from 2003 to 2018 (N=37,300) to describe disparities in patient-provider messaging and looking for health information on the Web. We first reported the percentage of individuals across education and racial and ethnic groups who reported using these tools in each survey year and compared changes in unadjusted disparities during preincentive (2003-2011) and postincentive (2011-2018) periods. Using multivariable linear probability models, we then examined adjusted effects of education and race and ethnicity in 3 periods—preincentive (2003-2005), early incentive (2011-2013), and postincentive (2017-2018)—controlling for sociodemographic and health factors. In the postincentive period, an additional model tested whether internet adoption, provider access, or providers’ use of EMRs explained disparities.ResultsFrom 2003 to 2018, overall rates of provider messaging increased from 4% to 36%. The gap in provider messaging between the highest and lowest education groups increased by 10 percentage points preincentive (P<.001) and 22 additional points postincentive (P<.001). The gap between Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites increased by 3.2 points preincentive (P=.42) and 11 additional points postincentive (P=.01). Trends for blacks resembled those for Hispanics, whereas trends for Asians resembled those for non-Hispanic whites. In contrast, education-based disparities in looking for health information on the Web (which was not directly incentivized) did not significantly change in preincentive or postincentive periods, whereas racial disparities narrowed by 15 percentage points preincentive (P=.008) and did not significantly change postincentive. After adjusting for other sociodemographic and health factors, observed associations were similar to unadjusted associations, though smaller in magnitude. Including internet adoption, provider access, and providers’ use of EMRs in the postincentive model attenuated, but did not eliminate, education-based disparities in provider messaging and looking for health information on the Web. Racial and ethnic disparities were no longer statistically significant in adjusted models.ConclusionsDisparities in provider messaging widened over time, particularly following federal financial incenti...

A Clinical Communication Tool (Loop) for Team-Based Care in Pediatric and Adult Care Settings: Hybrid Mixed Methods Implementation Study

“…Future research could specifically focus on a health care region, integrate Loop with existing eHealth tools, pilot a compensation structure for asynchronous communication, deimplement or re-design optimal communication workflows from the ground up, and support requirements or conditions for collaboration to occur. In addition, future research should examine the impact of eHealth implementation on health disparities, which have been shown to increase with the introduction of patient–provider messaging tools [ 66 ]. Despite the considerable and seemingly intractable barriers identified in this study, the trend toward more digital communication in health care is inevitable and it is likely that an interoperable system of communication and documentation will emerge in time.…”

Email Patient-Provider Communication and Cancer Screenings Among US Adults: Cross-sectional Study

“…Among older adults, its prevalence rose from 2.7% in 2009 to 14.2% in 2018 [8]. Regardless of increasing trends, email PPC remains underutilized, and disparities exist based on demographic, socioeconomic, and health-related characteristics [7,[9][10][11][12]. Previous studies have found that adults who engage in email PPC are more likely to be female and younger aged; living in urban areas; have higher levels of education and income; and have a history of chronic disease [7,[9][10][11].…”

“…Regardless of increasing trends, email PPC remains underutilized, and disparities exist based on demographic, socioeconomic, and health-related characteristics [7,[9][10][11][12]. Previous studies have found that adults who engage in email PPC are more likely to be female and younger aged; living in urban areas; have higher levels of education and income; and have a history of chronic disease [7,[9][10][11]. Several studies have found that non-Hispanic White adults are more likely to use email PPC than non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic adults [4], yet the usage of email PCC among Hispanic adults varies by US-and foreign-born subgroups [12].…”

“…In 2003, only 4% of adults reported using email to communicate with their health care provider. By 2018, the prevalence of email PPC had increased to 36% [ 7 ]. Among older adults, its prevalence rose from 2.7% in 2009 to 14.2% in 2018 [ 8 ].…”

Electronic Medical Record–Based Electronic Messaging Among Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

“…53 Non-users are significantly more likely to be male, Black, have Hispanic ethnicity, have lower education attainment, and have lower income. [54][55][56][57] However, our review of literature illustrates that reasons for these disparities have not been well-established in the setting of breast cancer.…”