2022
DOI: 10.3390/app12115625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grouting Effect Detection within the Floor of a Coal Seam Using 3D Electric Resistivity Tomography (ERT) with Arbitrary Electrode Positions

Abstract: To prevent the occurrence of water inrush from the working face floor, explorations of water-rich floors are necessary. For a working face with a regular shape, a water-rich floor can be detected by laying electrodes and cables around the working face. However, the rectangular working face develops an irregular shape, and the exploration of water in irregular working faces is a difficulty in the study of 3D electric resistivity tomography (ERT). In this paper, an unconventional dipole–dipole array is used for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies [46][47][48] performed near the present study area employed electrical resistivity imaging methods to define the coal seams and subterranean voids. [49][50][51][52][53] are some of the previous research works that used resistivity methods for coal exploration and coal mine workings.…”
Section: Geophysical Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies [46][47][48] performed near the present study area employed electrical resistivity imaging methods to define the coal seams and subterranean voids. [49][50][51][52][53] are some of the previous research works that used resistivity methods for coal exploration and coal mine workings.…”
Section: Geophysical Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many academics and engineering technicians in China and elsewhere have conducted research on the evaluation of underground grouting effectiveness. Methods commonly used include geophysical detection methods [4][5][6][7], packer testing [8][9][10], computer numerical simulations [11][12][13][14], and comprehensive evaluation methods, among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%