Groupware extension for a software-project management system

Kurbel, Karl

doi:10.1016/0263-7863(94)90046-9

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…demonstrates the extent to which RefMod PM represents significant research progress in the field of PMIS reference models, since it has a significantly wider scope, covering not only project planning and execution, but also the initiation and termination phase, has been designed to serve both single and multi project management purposes, and covers all functional areas of PMI's PMBOK. 9]. c A prototype has been developed, although it is unclear whether this prototype has been evaluated.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Towards a conceptual reference model for project management information systems

Ahlemann¹

2009

International Journal of Project Management

110

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[6][7][8]), (3) the development of prototypes to test new kinds of functionality (e.g. [9][10][11]), and (4) research into the usage of project management software systems (e.g. [12][13][14]).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards a conceptual reference model for project management information systems

Ahlemann¹

2009

International Journal of Project Management

110

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Few attempts are tackling the development assistance for project management systems. For instance, (Kurbel, 1994;Schulz et al, 1996) are proposed a prototypes that are limited to testing new features such as project scheduling, project threshold and project activity.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis and Design of a Project Portfolio Management System

Hannach¹,

Marghoubi²,

Akkaoui³

et al. 2019

CIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paramount importance of project portfolios for business drives managers to search for highly efficient support tools to overcome complex challenges of their management. A major tradeoff is to acquire tools able to produce a convenient portfolio project prioritization process, on which business investments are decided. However, by using existing Project Portfolio Management Systems (PPMS), many concurrent projects in a portfolio are usually prioritized and planned in the upstream life-cycle phases according to financial criteria, and overlooking the portfolio alignment to enterprise strategies and the availability of resources, although their importance. In this paper, we propose a conceptual formalization of PPMS with respect to a double portfolio prioritization process that performs two levels of selections according to both: i.) Strategy alignment, including returns on investment, size, and total cost; and ii.) Execution capability, as the organization should be able to manage and deliver the selected projects' outcomes. The advantage of our PPMS framework is twofold. First, it is useful to be customized by designers to fit organization needs. Second it is built with respect to the double prioritization phase process, as an end-to-end process that guarantees optimal portfolios generation. Further, the proposed PPMS system and its identified functionalities are validated through an implementation of a prototype tool.

show abstract