2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Groups in space: Stereotypes and the spatial agency bias

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

6
76
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(48 reference statements)
6
76
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies bear a family resemblance to other research demonstrating subtle effects of gender stereotypes on the ordering of information in pictures (Maass et al, 2009) and graphs (Hegarty et al, in press). However, we would caution against the interpretation that effects of gender stereotypes on order are manifestations of identical processes in verbal and visual domains.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These studies bear a family resemblance to other research demonstrating subtle effects of gender stereotypes on the ordering of information in pictures (Maass et al, 2009) and graphs (Hegarty et al, in press). However, we would caution against the interpretation that effects of gender stereotypes on order are manifestations of identical processes in verbal and visual domains.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…However, we would caution against the interpretation that effects of gender stereotypes on order are manifestations of identical processes in verbal and visual domains. To be sure, people prefer to position more agentic entities first in pictures (Maass et al, 2009) and in binomial phrases (McDonald et al, 1993). Furthermore, Maass et al (2009) argue that the subject-object order of human languages is partially responsible for the bias to position more agentic groups first in the leftright axis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations