2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10958-016-2688-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Groups Acting on Dendrons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Except for the extreme proximality claim the following results were proven (independently) in [38], [27], [7] and [39].…”
Section: Some Consequences Of the Tameness Of Actions On Dendritesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Except for the extreme proximality claim the following results were proven (independently) in [38], [27], [7] and [39].…”
Section: Some Consequences Of the Tameness Of Actions On Dendritesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We notice that (i) and (ii) are stated in [20] as Corollary 2.15.1, and the proof of (iii), as noted by Malyutin [14], can be obtained as a consequence of Lemma 2.7 combined with Corollary 2.14 of [20].…”
Section: Set Up and Toolsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Shi proved that every minimal group action on dendrites is strongly proximal and the acting group cannot be amenable (see [14,15]). Based on the results obtained by Marzougui and Naghmouchi in [8], Shi and Ye showed that every amenable group action on dendrites always has a minimal set consisting of 1 or 2 points (see [16]), which is also implied by the work of Malyutin and Duchesne-Monod (see [6,3]). Glasner and Megrelishvili showed the extreme proximality of minimal subsystems provided that the group actions on dendrites have no finite orbits (see [5]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%