2008
DOI: 10.24033/msmf.425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Groupes de Chow-Witt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
111
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore The case d = 2 is a little bit different and was known from [5] or [13]. As a straightforward consequence of our results, we get the following theorem: …”
Section: Chow-witt Groupsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore The case d = 2 is a little bit different and was known from [5] or [13]. As a straightforward consequence of our results, we get the following theorem: …”
Section: Chow-witt Groupsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The implicationc d (P ) = 0 ⇒ P Q ⊕ A follows then from Propositions 23 and 24. The other implication is Corollary 13.3.3 in [13].…”
Section: Let {E(n)mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While we have particular interest in the setting of singular varieties and we also provide further insight into nonsingular varieties in these articles. Our interest in Witt theory stems from the introduction of Chow-Witt groups, [1] and developed by Fasel [3], as obstruction groups for projective modules to split off a free direct summand. The readers are referred to [4] for further introductory comments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%