1988
DOI: 10.1037/0022-006x.56.3.393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group treatment of depression: Individual predictors of outcome.

Abstract: Garfield and McLean pointed to methodological issues (e.g., sample heterogeneity, dissimilar dependent variables, and incompletely specified treatments) as underlying the lack of success in distinguishing the individual characteristics related to outcome, both within and across studies.Anumberof studies have grappled with these methodological issues in their attempts to identify individual predictors of outcome after cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression (

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
39
2
3

Year Published

1991
1991
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
39
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that ‘preference for group therapy’ was inversely related to change on chief complaints is contrary to findings in the literature [10, 29, 30, 31]. Neither ‘therapist expectation’ of effective work, nor ‘patient optimism’ were positive predictors, which is in line with the very limited effect of ‘patient optimism’ in the primary analyses.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fact that ‘preference for group therapy’ was inversely related to change on chief complaints is contrary to findings in the literature [10, 29, 30, 31]. Neither ‘therapist expectation’ of effective work, nor ‘patient optimism’ were positive predictors, which is in line with the very limited effect of ‘patient optimism’ in the primary analyses.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…There is evidence for a positive impact of variables measuring expectancy of a favourable outcome [10, 29, 30, 31]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence suggests that being married may be a predictor of better response to CBT (Jarrett, Eaves, Grannemann, & Rush, 1991;Sotsky et al, 1991). Also increased pretreatment levels of depressive symptoms and dysfunctional attitudes have been shown to predict poorer outcome in CBT (Hoberman, Lewinsohn, & Tilson, 1988;Jarrett et al, 1991;Simons, Gordon, Monroe, & Thase 1995;Sotsky et al, 1991;Thase, Simons, Cahalane, McGeary, & Harden, 1991), while other studies found no correlation between severity of depression and outcome for cognitive therapy and CBT (Hollon et al, 1992;Shapiro et al, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…With a group of subjects who are psychologically unaware, or unused to talking about themselves, more time and intital training in communication skills may be necessary to establish group cohesiveness. Cohesiveness is essential for effective group counseling (Yalom, 1975), and has been identified as one of the most important contributors to alleviation of depression in group counseling by Hoberman, Lewinsohn, and Tilson (1988). In a study of 40 men and women with a mean age of 38.3, percieved group cohesiveness measured at sessions 3 and 7 in a 12-week Coping with Depression Course was one of the factors associated with reduction in depression levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%