1949
DOI: 10.2307/1932623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group Survival Value for Philodina Rosola, A Rotifer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence of pollinator preferences, plant populations with a low density may suffer from a decrease in pollination visits (pollinator limitation) due to a reduced attractiveness caused by fewer attraction cues, a lower total reward and longer travel times between bouts (Eriksson and Ehrlen 1992;Feldman 2008;Klinkhamer et al 1989;Sih and Baltus 1987). Very small or isolated populations are exposed to the risk of going extinct due to inbreeding depression caused by mating with closely related individuals or reproductive failure due to ineffective pollination (absence of pollinators) (Allee effect;Allee 1949;Dornier et al 2008;Forsyth 2003;Groom 1998;Lamont et al 1993). For a thorough understanding of the stability of mutualism, one has to understand how variation in population/community structure interacts with the occurrence and frequency of nectarless individuals or species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence of pollinator preferences, plant populations with a low density may suffer from a decrease in pollination visits (pollinator limitation) due to a reduced attractiveness caused by fewer attraction cues, a lower total reward and longer travel times between bouts (Eriksson and Ehrlen 1992;Feldman 2008;Klinkhamer et al 1989;Sih and Baltus 1987). Very small or isolated populations are exposed to the risk of going extinct due to inbreeding depression caused by mating with closely related individuals or reproductive failure due to ineffective pollination (absence of pollinators) (Allee effect;Allee 1949;Dornier et al 2008;Forsyth 2003;Groom 1998;Lamont et al 1993). For a thorough understanding of the stability of mutualism, one has to understand how variation in population/community structure interacts with the occurrence and frequency of nectarless individuals or species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limited gene flow after logging may also reduce genetic variability and thus the ability to adapt to changing environmental conditions. In concert, these processes may lead to negative density dependence at low densities (Allee, 1949), increasing the risk of local extinction for timber tree populations.…”
Section: Practical Considerations Of Livelihood and Sometimes Aesthetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Allee effect is a phenomenon in ecology characterized by a positive correlation between population density (or size) and its per capita growth rate [1,2]. In their book, Courchamp et al [8] described the Allee effect in a straightforward manner: 'The more the merrier' (see also [9]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mate limitation, predator saturation, etc), and the demographic Allee effect (of overriding concern to conservationists). From these authors' point of view, the benefits of conspecificity (two or more individuals are conspecific if they belong to the same species) may include one or more predator dilution or saturation: (1) Antipredator vigilance or aggression; (2) cooperative predation or resource defense; (3) social thermoregulation; (4) collective modification or amelioration of the environment; (5) increased pollination or fertilization success; (6) conspecific enhancement of reproduction; and (7) reduction of inbreeding, genetic drift or loss of integrity by hybridization. Stephens et al [31], then, put forward a definition of the Allee effect as follows: 'The Allee effect is defined as a positive relationship between any component of individual fitness and either numbers or density of conspecifics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%