Group Size, ICC Values, and Group-Level Correlations: A Simulation

Abstract

In the organizational literature, the impact of group size on the magnitude of the group-level correlation has not been explicitly delineated, despite the fact that group sizes vary considerably in organizational research. This article discusses the relationship between group size, ICC(J) values, and the magnitude of the group-level correlation, and shows that group size and ICC(I) values are important because they influence the reliability of the aggregate variables. Based on this discussion, a correction for attenuation formula is proposed that permits one to estimate the magnitude of the actual group-level correlation corrected for the reliability of the aggregate variables. A simulation study demonstrates that the correction for attenuation formula provides accurate estimates of the actual group-level correlation under a wide range of conditions. Implications for multilevel analyses are discussed.

Examining the Link Between Ethical Leadership and Employee Misconduct: The Mediating Role of Ethical Climate

“…One of the ICC (2) values is a slightly lower than the 0.70 criteria recommended by researchers (Bliese et al, 2002). However, ICC (2) is a function of size (Bliese, 1998), and the average unit size in this study was smaller than the studies used in recommending cutoff criteria. Therefore, as all of the ICC values were statistically significant and the r wg values were high indicating that there was high within-group agreement, there is support for aggregation.…”

Keep the fire burning: Reciprocal gains of basic need satisfaction, intrinsic motivation and innovative work behaviour

“…Given that we found strong intercorrelations between the three dimensions of IWB (i.e., idea generation and idea promotion: r = .84/idea generation and idea realization: r = .79/idea promotion NEEDS, MOTIVATION AND IWB 495 and idea realization: r = .85) and following the recommendation of Janssen (2000), we averaged the nine items to obtain an overall score of IWB. Moreover, we averaged the two peer ratings to obtain one final score for IWB as the intra-class correlation (ICC) between these two peer ratings, amounting to .33, indicates an adequate level of agreement between the two raters (Bliese, 1998). Coefficients alpha (i.e., Cronbach's alpha) across all measurement moments ranged from .89 to .97 (mean alpha = .94).…”

Existing Knowledge, Knowledge Creation Capability, and the Rate of New Product Introduction in High-Technology Firms

“…Respondents were asked to assess their agreement (1 ϭ "strongly disagree," to 5 ϭ "strongly agree") with statements about their organization's climate. Both scales showed good reliability (risk taking, ␣ ϭ .88; teamwork, ␣ ϭ .87) and support for aggregation (see Bliese [1998] Firm-level knowledge creation capability. Measures of knowledge creation capability were provided by the surveys of the knowledge workers.…”