The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.12.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group size, grooming and fission in primates: A modeling approach based on group structure

Abstract: a b s t r a c tIn social animals, fission is a common mode of group proliferation and dispersion and may be affected by genetic or other social factors. Sociality implies preserving relationships between group members. An increase in group size and/or in competition for food within the group can result in decrease certain social interactions between members, and the group may split irreversibly as a consequence. One individual may try to maintain bonds with a maximum of group members in order to keep group coh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
49
2
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
(157 reference statements)
0
49
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Taken in conjunction with the capping of grooming cliques, the fact that Samara females do not do so suggests that there may be increasing stochasticity, not only in spatial coordination, but also in activity scheduling [35]. That is, two females, who might be inclined to interact, may find themselves near each other at times when they are unable to coordinate their schedules.…”
Section: Discussion (A) Social Responses To Increased Group Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taken in conjunction with the capping of grooming cliques, the fact that Samara females do not do so suggests that there may be increasing stochasticity, not only in spatial coordination, but also in activity scheduling [35]. That is, two females, who might be inclined to interact, may find themselves near each other at times when they are unable to coordinate their schedules.…”
Section: Discussion (A) Social Responses To Increased Group Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, few studies have tackled collective decision as a function of social relationships and the role of a leader [5]. Our main objective is to study the link between individual behavior, interaction between individuals, and collective responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elgar, 1989;Hamilton, 1971;Penning et al, 1993;Pulliam and Caraco, 1984) and have practical importance for predicting how group size and anthropogenic pressures affect social cohesiveness and fission-fusion dynamics (e.g. Chapman and Valenta, 2015;Sueur et al, 2011). Interest in the mechanisms underlying synchrony is increasing (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%