1984
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.81.19.6073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group selection for a polygenic behavioral trait: estimating the degree of population subdivision.

Abstract: For assessing the degree of population subdivision, and therefore the extent to which group selection might favor an altruistic trait, an appropriate measure is Nei's GST, defined by (F0-F)/(1-F). F0 is the probability that two alleles drawn from the same group are identical in state and F is the probability for two alleles drawn at random from the entire population. These probabilities can be assessed from molecular polymorphisms. GST has a number of properties that make it useful for empirical studies. When … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
373
0
6

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 548 publications
(391 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
12
373
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Crow and Aoki's (1984) approximation indicates that for a generation time of one year (Bart and Page 1992) and regional effective population size of 1()4, 6 should go halfway to equilibrium in 220 to 3960 years (using the range of Nm values observed in this study). Significant isolation-by-distance was detected in all species occupying the Ozark region via rank correlation, but analysis of genetic variance and UPGMA dendrograms (data not TABLE 4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Crow and Aoki's (1984) approximation indicates that for a generation time of one year (Bart and Page 1992) and regional effective population size of 1()4, 6 should go halfway to equilibrium in 220 to 3960 years (using the range of Nm values observed in this study). Significant isolation-by-distance was detected in all species occupying the Ozark region via rank correlation, but analysis of genetic variance and UPGMA dendrograms (data not TABLE 4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…O mesmo parâmetro (Nm), calculado pelo método de Crow & Aoki (1984), por ser indicado para o caso de poucas subpopulações, resultou num N m de 0,9, com um tamanho de vizinhança de 5,5 indivíduos, a partir da fórmula para um modelo de alpondras (Slatkin & Barton 1989).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…But different variants of this trait may also segregate in the population. To take this case into account, we also evaluate F ij under the situation where k cultural variants of the focal trait segregate in the population (as per Crow & Aoki 1984;Enquist et al 2010), in which case the cultural state probabilities (r, q ij , f ij ) are evaluated for a focal variant of the focal trait. Here, we assume that an individual inheriting the focal cultural trait during stage 2 of the life cycle actually inherits the variant of its cultural parent.…”
Section: Life Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If p s is interpreted as the coalescence probability of pairs of genes, this equation is equivalent to the standard F ST value for haploid individuals in the island model of dispersal under the k allele model of mutation (e.g. Crow & Aoki 1984;Rousset 2004). If n ¼ m the population structure predicted by equation (7) becomes equivalent to that predicted by equation (4) with b ¼ 1 as k becomes large (k/N).…”
Section: Cultural Inheritance From Both Sexesmentioning
confidence: 99%