2021
DOI: 10.33774/apsa-2021-wnwqw
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group Salience, Inflammatory Rhetoric, and the Persistence of Hate Against Religious Minorities

Abstract: Recorded hate crimes surged at several points during and after the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Observers argued that hate crimes, especially against Muslims, increased due to inflammatory rhetoric. Did anti-Muslim hate crimes decline after the salience of Muslims and accompanying inflammatory rhetoric receded? Or did emboldening and organizational effects on hate crimes endure? Using data sources on online discussions (4chan, Gab, Reddit), media coverage (newspapers, Google Trends), and hate crime databas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, this study connects bottom–up and top–down accounts of antiminority violence. Supply-side accounts argue that political elites and public discourse affect the incidence of hate crime by shaping the opportunities and constraints for violent mobilization ( 30 32 ). By demonstrating that individual beliefs condoning antirefugee attacks can help elect elites that further propagate such violence, this paper offers a bridge between supply- and demand-side accounts of intergroup violence, making it clear that elite-level discourse reflects mass attitudes toward hate crime.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, this study connects bottom–up and top–down accounts of antiminority violence. Supply-side accounts argue that political elites and public discourse affect the incidence of hate crime by shaping the opportunities and constraints for violent mobilization ( 30 32 ). By demonstrating that individual beliefs condoning antirefugee attacks can help elect elites that further propagate such violence, this paper offers a bridge between supply- and demand-side accounts of intergroup violence, making it clear that elite-level discourse reflects mass attitudes toward hate crime.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%