1977
DOI: 10.1097/00005053-197711000-00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group Relations Reader

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The paranoid-schizoid position manifests in a young or immature system. Paranoid refers to badness being experienced as coming from outside the self, and schizoid refers to splitting off (Colman & Bexton, 1975;Colman & Geller, 1985;Cytrynbaum & Noumair, 2004). Schizoid splitting refers to the splitting off and projecting outwards of those parts of the self perceived as bad, thereby creating external figures who are both hated and feared.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paranoid-schizoid position manifests in a young or immature system. Paranoid refers to badness being experienced as coming from outside the self, and schizoid refers to splitting off (Colman & Bexton, 1975;Colman & Geller, 1985;Cytrynbaum & Noumair, 2004). Schizoid splitting refers to the splitting off and projecting outwards of those parts of the self perceived as bad, thereby creating external figures who are both hated and feared.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participative dimension of action research is also inherently linked to the dynamics of the group as it develops and takes on a life of its own. Therefore, we use group relations theory (Bennis & Shepard, 1974;Bion, 1961;Colman & Bexton, 1975;Klein, 1985Klein, [1959Miller, 1965;Rioch, 1975;Wells, 1990) to suggest that doing action research democratically means going step-by-step through a process of negotiating authority, clarifying tasks and roles, and setting boundaries among the group members. In this process, nothing and no one can be taken for granted.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we use role to describe the different ways in which individuals within a group take up the work of the group. When roles are not clearly defined a group may become stuck on its primary task, and it may also be difficult to achieve genuine engagement (Colman & Bexton, 1975).…”
Section: Hitting the Road: Paradoxes Of Putting Action Theory Into Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seeing the group as an organism with boundaries and a self is an idea many group theorists have explored (e.g., Bion, 1959;Colman & Bexton, 1975;Yalom, 1970). To the extent that the group itself can remain cohesive and flexible in response to the vicissitudes of comings and goings, vacations, illnesses, bad interactions, questioning and arguments, the individual patient can experience a "good enough" holding environment (Winnicott, 1965) in which to flourish.…”
Section: Idealizing Transferences In Group Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%