1960
DOI: 10.2307/1169088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group Procedures in Guidance and Personnel Work

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1961
1961
1963
1963

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relatively few experimental studies have reported this comparison as their purpose (Bailey, 1955;Baymur & Patterson, 1960;Bilovsky, et al, 1953;Froehlich, 1958;Hewer, 1959). Hoyt (1955), and Hoyt and Moore (1960) support a belief in the potential of multiple counseling, but indicate the need for further comparisons of the group process with individual counseling in different settings and for various purposes. Wrenn (1960) suggests the desirability of identifying the distinctive values of each process, and Hewer (1959) points up the importance of including a comparable control group in the experimental design.…”
Section: Vtuh State Universitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatively few experimental studies have reported this comparison as their purpose (Bailey, 1955;Baymur & Patterson, 1960;Bilovsky, et al, 1953;Froehlich, 1958;Hewer, 1959). Hoyt (1955), and Hoyt and Moore (1960) support a belief in the potential of multiple counseling, but indicate the need for further comparisons of the group process with individual counseling in different settings and for various purposes. Wrenn (1960) suggests the desirability of identifying the distinctive values of each process, and Hewer (1959) points up the importance of including a comparable control group in the experimental design.…”
Section: Vtuh State Universitymentioning
confidence: 99%