Abstract:In this article, I examine group medical visits, a clinic-based intervention that aims to improve patient health by combining clinical care, health education and peer support. Research shows that health care inequalities are reproduced through the interplay of interpersonal, institutional, and structural factors. I examine changing social relations made possible by group visits, including peer support and an expanded role for patient knowledge. The qualitative data presented here are part of a mixed-methods st… Show more
“…A similar finding was reported in another qualitative study 23 of GMAs in the United States. In addition, Thompson-Lastad 24 reported that staff involved with group medical appointments felt that patient interactions with other patients was the most important aspect of these appointments; they also reported that patients could support one another in ways that health providers could not. Although the social atmosphere may be beneficial for some individuals, in the case of more shy or reserved participants, we found that they had some hesitancy to engage in the conversation and ask questions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Although GMAs have shown benefits, understanding patient experiences with these types of appointments is essential to help to refine this emerging approach to care for people with type 2 diabetes. Although a few studies to date have captured qualitative patient experiences and perspectives with this method for managing type 2 diabetes, 7,21,23,24 these type of data are scarce. To our knowledge, no studies have examined naturalistic patient experiences and perspectives of GMAs for type 2 diabetes in a rural Saskatchewan context.…”
Purpose The purpose of this study was to capture information on patient experiences and perspectives of group medical appointments (GMAs) and compare them to those attending individual appointments (IAs) with the diabetes education team (usual care) for managing type 2 diabetes. Methods Adults (N = 18; 61% male; 83% 50-70 years old ) with type 2 diabetes (or prediabetes) living in rural Saskatchewan were recruited to complete a semistructured interview on their experiences with GMAs or IAs. To be eligible to participate, individuals must have attended at least 2 GMAs or 2 IAs. Transcripts were coded and analyzed using content analysis. Results Overall, participants spoke highly of their respective appointment type. Results indicated that both appointment types positively influenced understanding of diabetes management, with the most notable difference being greater understanding of stress management in the GMAs. Participants identified several positive aspects of each appointment type, which included convenience, supportive and enjoyable, and informative for GMAs and time and tailored information for IAs. Participants provided some suggestions to improve diabetes related-care for their respective appointment type. Conclusions Participants of GMAs and IAs for type 2 diabetes each reported unique strengths to their respective care plan and reported benefiting from their care.
“…A similar finding was reported in another qualitative study 23 of GMAs in the United States. In addition, Thompson-Lastad 24 reported that staff involved with group medical appointments felt that patient interactions with other patients was the most important aspect of these appointments; they also reported that patients could support one another in ways that health providers could not. Although the social atmosphere may be beneficial for some individuals, in the case of more shy or reserved participants, we found that they had some hesitancy to engage in the conversation and ask questions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Although GMAs have shown benefits, understanding patient experiences with these types of appointments is essential to help to refine this emerging approach to care for people with type 2 diabetes. Although a few studies to date have captured qualitative patient experiences and perspectives with this method for managing type 2 diabetes, 7,21,23,24 these type of data are scarce. To our knowledge, no studies have examined naturalistic patient experiences and perspectives of GMAs for type 2 diabetes in a rural Saskatchewan context.…”
Purpose The purpose of this study was to capture information on patient experiences and perspectives of group medical appointments (GMAs) and compare them to those attending individual appointments (IAs) with the diabetes education team (usual care) for managing type 2 diabetes. Methods Adults (N = 18; 61% male; 83% 50-70 years old ) with type 2 diabetes (or prediabetes) living in rural Saskatchewan were recruited to complete a semistructured interview on their experiences with GMAs or IAs. To be eligible to participate, individuals must have attended at least 2 GMAs or 2 IAs. Transcripts were coded and analyzed using content analysis. Results Overall, participants spoke highly of their respective appointment type. Results indicated that both appointment types positively influenced understanding of diabetes management, with the most notable difference being greater understanding of stress management in the GMAs. Participants identified several positive aspects of each appointment type, which included convenience, supportive and enjoyable, and informative for GMAs and time and tailored information for IAs. Participants provided some suggestions to improve diabetes related-care for their respective appointment type. Conclusions Participants of GMAs and IAs for type 2 diabetes each reported unique strengths to their respective care plan and reported benefiting from their care.
“…All authors of this article have ongoing qualitative and mixed-methods projects examining group-based integrative care for chronic pain. 14,26,41 Our projects suggest that such approaches are a promising innovation that may help reduce or eliminate opioid medication use while allowing organizations to comply with Joint Commission requirements to offer non-pharmacological chronic pain treatment options. 42 In addition to offering GMVs in which they bill patients' health insurance, most sites offered additional free or low-cost, group-based complementary health approaches such as yoga and tai chi.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative data (reported separately) aimed to provide in-depth understanding of well-developed safety-net IGMV programs. 26 The survey was developed by the authors in consultation with clinicians with IGMV experience. We included questions on the scope and structure of IGMVs around the United States.…”
Purpose: Integrative group medical visits (IGMVs) aim to increase access to complementary and integrative health care, which is particularly relevant for low-income people. We sought to describe IGMV programs in US safety-net clinics through a survey of providers.Methods: An online and paper survey was conducted to collect data on the use of complementary health approaches and characteristics of IGMV programs. We recruited a purposive sample of safety-net clinicians via national meetings and listservs.Results: Fifty-seven clinicians reported on group medical visits. Forty percent worked in federally qualified health centers, 57% in safety-net or teaching hospitals, 23% in other settings such as free clinics. Thirty-seven respondents in 11 states provided care in IGMVs, most commonly for chronic pain and diabetes. Nutrition (70%), mindfulness/meditation/breathing (59%), and tai chi/yoga/other movement practices (51%) were the most common treatment approaches in IGMVs.Conclusion: Safety-net institutions in 11 states offered IGMVs to treat a range of chronic conditions. IGMVs are an innovative model to improve access to non-pharmacologic approaches to chronic illness care and health promotion. They may advance health equity by serving patients negatively impacted by health and health care disparities.
“…Understanding patients’ social context and addressing social determinants of health: In GMVs, patients participate in one another’s care by providing support, resources and advocacy. 6 Extended time and the presence of peers facilitate patients sharing knowledge and experiences, reducing loneliness while providing clinicians, other health care staff and peers the opportunity to provide referrals and follow-up with needed resources. These can include not only access to needed health care (e.g.…”
Section: How Can Gmvs Benefit Clinician Wellbeing?mentioning
There is strong evidence for clinical benefits of group medical visits (GMVs) (also known as shared medical appointments) for prenatal care, diabetes, chronic pain, and a wide range of other conditions. GMVs can increase access to integrative care while providing additional benefits including increased clinician-patient contact time, cost savings, and support with prevention and self-management of chronic conditions. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many clinical sites are experimenting with new models of care delivery including virtual GMVs using telehealth. Little research has focused on which clinicians offer this type of care, how the GMV approach affects the ways they practice, and their job satisfaction. Workplace-based interventions have been shown to decrease burnout in individual physicians. We argue that more research is needed to understand if GMVs should be considered among these workplace-based interventions, given their potential benefits to clinician wellbeing. GMVs can benefit clinician wellbeing in multiple ways, including: (1) Extended time with patients; (2) Increased ability to provide team-based care; (3) Understanding patients’ social context and addressing social determinants of health. GMVs can be implemented in a variety of settings in many different ways depending on institutional context, patient needs and clinician preferences. We suggest that GMV programs with adequate institutional support may be beneficial for preventing burnout and improving retention among clinicians and health care teams more broadly, including in integrative health care. Just as group support benefits patients struggling with loneliness and social isolation, GMVs can help address these and other concerns in overwhelmed clinicians.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.