2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.02.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group I metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonists impair discriminability of reinforcer magnitude, but not risky choice, in a probability-discounting task

Abstract: The glutamatergic system has been identified as an important mediator of risky choice. However, previous studies have focused primarily on ionotropic glutamate receptors (e.g., NMDA receptors). Little research has examined the contribution of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) on risky choice. The goal of the current experiment was to determine the effects of mGluR 1 and mGluR 5 antagonism on risky choice as assessed in probability discounting (PD). Male Sprague Dawley rats (n = 24) were trained in PD, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While some of the structural features of delay-discounting procedures have been useful in developing probabilitydiscounting procedures, measures and methods of data analysis unique to probability discounting are needed (e.g., Green & Myerson, 2019;Yates, 2019). Still, modern probability-discounting research has yet to employ novel measures of probability discounting (e.g., Islas-Preciado et al, 2020;Ozga & Anderson, 2019;Yates et al, 2019).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some of the structural features of delay-discounting procedures have been useful in developing probabilitydiscounting procedures, measures and methods of data analysis unique to probability discounting are needed (e.g., Green & Myerson, 2019;Yates, 2019). Still, modern probability-discounting research has yet to employ novel measures of probability discounting (e.g., Islas-Preciado et al, 2020;Ozga & Anderson, 2019;Yates et al, 2019).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%