2002
DOI: 10.1002/mop.10602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group delay measurement of WDM components using photonic microwave technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For accurate DGD measurement, the polarization dependence of the auxiliary fibers, PC, and the fiber-optic coupler should be eliminated by using calibration, where a reflector is used instead of the tested grating. Our calibration results show that less than 0.5-ps DGD is obtained, which is within the noise floor (Ϯ1 ps) of the measurement system [3], and can be omitted in the following DGD measurement of the CFBG.…”
Section: Measurement Techniquementioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For accurate DGD measurement, the polarization dependence of the auxiliary fibers, PC, and the fiber-optic coupler should be eliminated by using calibration, where a reflector is used instead of the tested grating. Our calibration results show that less than 0.5-ps DGD is obtained, which is within the noise floor (Ϯ1 ps) of the measurement system [3], and can be omitted in the following DGD measurement of the CFBG.…”
Section: Measurement Techniquementioning
confidence: 95%
“…To ensure f is determined unambiguously, 0 is chosen to be larger than t in our proposed system [3]. It can be seen that at a fixed input wavelength, that is, where cd is fixed, by changing the input polarization of the device under test (DUT), the filter's frequency-spectrum-range (FSR), FSR ϭ 1/͉͉, is shifted accordingly.…”
Section: Measurement Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations