2004
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-97332004000100008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group contributions to the solvation free energy from MST continuum calculations

Abstract: Group contributions to the free energy of solvation in water and octanol as well as to the octanol/water partition coefficient have been determined from Miertus-Scrocco-Tomasi continuum calculations. Particular attention is paid to the influence exerted by the procedure used to carry out the charge normalization in the MST model, as well as to the formalism of the partitioning scheme. A good agreement is found between the group contributions calculated by using different charge normalization and partitioning s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are the energy of cavity formation in the solvent to house the probe molecule, the work of additional polarization and change in the molecular geometry of the probe on going from vacuum to the solvent, the energies of the probe-solvent electrostatic and dispersion interactions, and the repulsive energy. 10-13,24, 25 The results of B3LYP quantum chemical calculations of these energy compo nents for DMAC are listed in Table 3. All of them depend on the properties of the medium.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are the energy of cavity formation in the solvent to house the probe molecule, the work of additional polarization and change in the molecular geometry of the probe on going from vacuum to the solvent, the energies of the probe-solvent electrostatic and dispersion interactions, and the repulsive energy. 10-13,24, 25 The results of B3LYP quantum chemical calculations of these energy compo nents for DMAC are listed in Table 3. All of them depend on the properties of the medium.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonelectrostatic models appropriate for use with PCMs have been developed over the years on an ad hoc basis 9,13 . Much of this work has been driven by Luque, Orozco, and coworkers, 116,364–370 who use the name “Miertuš‐Scrocco‐Tomasi” (MST) solvation model in acknowledgement of the original authors of the model that is now known as D‐PCM [Equation ()] 3 . The MST‐PCM approach combines a PCM (to compute Gelst) with a SASA‐type model for Gnonelst, along the lines of what will be discussed in Section 4.2.…”
Section: Solvation Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last years, theoretical methods have been developed to calculate fragment contributions to the solvation free energy, particularly in the framework of quantum mechanical (QM) continuum solvation methods [Klamt et al, 2009]. Thus, fractional methods based on GB/SA methods have been developed [Cramer & Truhlar, 2008], as well as those based on the MST(Miertus-Scrocco-Tomasi) solvation method model [Soteras et al, 2004].…”
Section: The Solvent and How To Model Itmentioning
confidence: 99%