1990
DOI: 10.1017/s014134730001795x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: This paper reports on two studies which show that cognitive therapy effects as much individual change when presented in small group format, as when presented in individual format to community-based populations suffering depression. In Study 1, referrals from an inner-city general practice health centre were assigned to group or individual cognitive therapy; or to waiting list control, while also receiving their usual treatment from their GP. Cognitive therapy was superior to the waiting list condition and grou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
48
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be argued that such criteria provide a more meaningful change index than relying solely on statistical significance and standardized effect sizes. The rates of clinically significant improvement compare very favorably to those reported in a number of group CBT studies (e.g., Kellett et al, 2007;Scott & Stradling, 1990;White, 1998), and support those who advocate the use of SMT for imparting cognitive-behavioral principles and skills in non-clinical contexts (Biglan et al, 2008;Brown, Cochrane, & Hancox, 2000;Schiraldi & Brown, 2001;White, 2000).…”
Section: Clinical Significancesupporting
confidence: 70%
“…It can be argued that such criteria provide a more meaningful change index than relying solely on statistical significance and standardized effect sizes. The rates of clinically significant improvement compare very favorably to those reported in a number of group CBT studies (e.g., Kellett et al, 2007;Scott & Stradling, 1990;White, 1998), and support those who advocate the use of SMT for imparting cognitive-behavioral principles and skills in non-clinical contexts (Biglan et al, 2008;Brown, Cochrane, & Hancox, 2000;Schiraldi & Brown, 2001;White, 2000).…”
Section: Clinical Significancesupporting
confidence: 70%
“…One study 28 was very similar to another study 29 , albeit not in all details, and although one author was involved in both studies, no reference was made in the later study to the earlier study. It was possible that the data from these two papers were based on the same research.…”
Section: Description Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…When we excluded the study that was possibly included twice (study 1 by Scott and Stradling) 29 We conducted separate analyses for the twelve studies (thirteen comparisons) in which equivalent interventions were examined in the individual and in the group format. The strength of the evidence is clearly stronger when we limit the meta-analysis to the studies in which an equivalent intervention was used in both formats.…”
Section: Differences Between Individual and Group Therapies At Post-testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M. J. Scott and Stradling (1990) Acute phase No relapse data; no formal definition of response. C. Scott et al (1997) Acute phase Compared TAU in primary care to TAU plus brief CT. TAU included pharmacotherapy for most patients.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%