2014 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/ictc.2014.6983265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group-based contention in IEEE 802.11ah networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The protocol of RAW prevents data packet transmissions from overlapping among the number of contending stations, and the problem of hidden node is alleviated by restricting the duration that a contending station is allowed to initiate transmission. This is why RAW requires to use groupbased contention strategies [21].…”
Section: Restricted Access Window (Raw)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protocol of RAW prevents data packet transmissions from overlapping among the number of contending stations, and the problem of hidden node is alleviated by restricting the duration that a contending station is allowed to initiate transmission. This is why RAW requires to use groupbased contention strategies [21].…”
Section: Restricted Access Window (Raw)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, there have been suggestions to further increase the power efficiency and high density access. Improved offset listen intervals for smart grid communication [27], [28], optimized sleep modes [29], and grouping strategies for dense IEEE 802.11ah networks [30], [31], [32] have been in the research focus recently.…”
Section: B the Ieee 80211ah Macmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the IEEE 802.11ah standard does not provide any guidelines for the group size. In this regard, the authors in [11] provided an expression to find the optimum group size on the basis of the number of active stations per group, traffic arrival rate, and the beacon interval. Nevertheless, in most of the existing solutions, devices are randomly assigned to different groups, and less attention has been given to the formation of efficient and reliable groups.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%