1951
DOI: 10.2307/4510223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group Adherence in the Common Tern

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sudden abandonment of colonies, as sometimes happens in the common tern (e.g. Austin ; Becker & Ludwigs ; Morris, Pekarik & Moore ), could also increase the number of potential immigrants in certain years, but to our knowledge, there was no such event in adjacent colonies in our study period (Appendix S2). This suggests that there are factors specific to Banter See colony that regulates how many of the potential immigrants in the system actually settle there in each year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sudden abandonment of colonies, as sometimes happens in the common tern (e.g. Austin ; Becker & Ludwigs ; Morris, Pekarik & Moore ), could also increase the number of potential immigrants in certain years, but to our knowledge, there was no such event in adjacent colonies in our study period (Appendix S2). This suggests that there are factors specific to Banter See colony that regulates how many of the potential immigrants in the system actually settle there in each year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…As common terns tend to exhibit low rates of breeding dispersal (Austin ; Becker et al . ; Szostek & Becker ; but see Austin ; Morris, Pekarik & Moore ), immigrants are likely first‐time breeders and therefore between 2 and 6 years old (Ludwigs & Becker ; mean age of first breeding 3·7 ± 0·1 years, n = 14 years, Szostek & Becker ). Because many individuals start reproducing at 3 years, we assumed in our integrated population model that all immigrants were 3 years old.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Site fidelity is probably lower for the marsh terns (Chlidonias) than for most other terns because of the unpredictability of the habitat (Ledwón et al, 2013). Group adherence, a preference for nesting with many of the same neighbors in a colony (Austin, 1951;McNicholl, 1975), can have opposing effects on the degree of philopatry. Among typically philopatric species, group adherence may enhance site fidelity, as terns are attracted not just to familiar colony and territory sites but also to familiar neighbors and are thus less likely to disperse.…”
Section: Philopatry and Dispersalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anecdotal evidence showed that in three species of North American terns ( Sterna spp. ), individuals from one colony site settled together at another colony site the next year, sometimes nesting in close proximity to each other (Austin , Haymes and Blokpoel , Gochfeld , Massey and Fancher , Spendelow et al. ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anecdotal evidence showed that in three species of North American terns (Sterna spp. ), individuals from one colony site settled together at another colony site the next year, sometimes nesting in close proximity to each other (Austin 1951, Haymes and Blokpoel 1978, Gochfeld 1979, Massey and Fancher 1989, Spendelow et al 1995. In the only systematic study of group integrity in a colonial species, groups of slender-billed gulls (Chroicocephalus genei) that had nested together and presumably had some familiarity with each other often settled together at a new site the next year, and groups were more likely to stay together if reproduction had been successful at the previous year's site (Francesiaz et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%