Molecular Metal‐Metal Bonds 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9783527673353.ch10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group 10 Metal–Metal Bonds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 168 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the nature of the metal−metal interaction in Pd III 2 remains unknown. Whereas many Pd III 2 complexes 23,24 contain direct Pd−Pd bonds, the Pd centers can also be linked through one or more bridging ligands. 25,26 Furthermore, most metal−metal bonded Pd III 2 complexes are obtained via oxidation of cofacially oriented, ligand-bridged, dinuclear Pd II 2 complexes in which the Pd centers are predisposed toward facile M−M bond formation using two-electron chemical oxidants.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, the nature of the metal−metal interaction in Pd III 2 remains unknown. Whereas many Pd III 2 complexes 23,24 contain direct Pd−Pd bonds, the Pd centers can also be linked through one or more bridging ligands. 25,26 Furthermore, most metal−metal bonded Pd III 2 complexes are obtained via oxidation of cofacially oriented, ligand-bridged, dinuclear Pd II 2 complexes in which the Pd centers are predisposed toward facile M−M bond formation using two-electron chemical oxidants.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the nature of the metal–metal interaction in Pd III 2 remains unknown. Whereas many Pd III 2 complexes , contain direct Pd–Pd bonds, the Pd centers can also be linked through one or more bridging ligands. , Furthermore, most metal–metal bonded Pd III 2 complexes are obtained via oxidation of cofacially oriented, ligand-bridged, dinuclear Pd II 2 complexes in which the Pd centers are predisposed toward facile M–M bond formation using two-electron chemical oxidants. In contrast, our Pd III 2 complex is generated via sequential one-electron electrochemical oxidation from a simple mononuclear Pd II (sulfate) complex, leaving open the critical questions of whether a M–M bond exists in the Pd III 2 species and what role it plays in fostering the unusual ECE electrochemical oxidation mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Pd–Pd distance of 2.4764(7) Å is consistent with the presence of a bond between the two metals. [15] The 78.04(4)° dihedral angle between the planes of the two coordinated DAF ligands presumably allows Pd–N bonding to be maximized while allowing the Pd centers to optimize Pd–Pd bonding. The acetate ligands exhibit a syn relationship, in which the carbonyl groups are oriented in the same direction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimately we used density functional theory (DFT) to model complex α . Calculations converged toward a complex displaying a 2.90-Å-long Pd II –Cu I contact, a length typical of group 10/group 11 heterobimetallic complexes involving a Pd II . The Pd II atom is square planar, while the Cu I atom shows a trigonal planar geometry with an additional apical bonding with Pd II .…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%