2019
DOI: 10.3390/environments6110116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Groundwater Vulnerability and Risk Assessment in A Karst Aquifer of Greece Using EPIK Method

Abstract: The aim of this study was the assessment of groundwater vulnerability and pollution risk of the Perivleptos karst aquifer in the northwestern part of Greece. Hence, the EPIK method has been applied within the study area. Additionally, a detailed literature overview has been obtained, including the worldwide application of the EPIK method. The hazard map has been developed for the implementation of risk assessment. The resulting vulnerability map was divided into four classes and showed especially high to very … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initially this type of models dealt only with groundwater intrinsic vulnerability, which is brought upon by the natural, hydrogeological factors of an aquifer (Vrba and Zoporozec, 1994;van Beynen et al, 2012). Revised versions of the models incorporated few aspects of specific vulnerability (natural parameters and human activities) namely information on land cover (Arauzo, 2017;Salman et al, 2019;Vogelbacher et al, 2019) and performed better than the purely intrinsic methods (Stigter et al, 2006). Nevertheless, there is some doubt that the concept of aquifer vulnerability is a valuable tool for groundwater quality protection, due to discrepancies between nitrate pollution maps and vulnerability maps (Stigter et al, 2006;Foster et al, 2007Foster et al, , 2013Rizeei et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially this type of models dealt only with groundwater intrinsic vulnerability, which is brought upon by the natural, hydrogeological factors of an aquifer (Vrba and Zoporozec, 1994;van Beynen et al, 2012). Revised versions of the models incorporated few aspects of specific vulnerability (natural parameters and human activities) namely information on land cover (Arauzo, 2017;Salman et al, 2019;Vogelbacher et al, 2019) and performed better than the purely intrinsic methods (Stigter et al, 2006). Nevertheless, there is some doubt that the concept of aquifer vulnerability is a valuable tool for groundwater quality protection, due to discrepancies between nitrate pollution maps and vulnerability maps (Stigter et al, 2006;Foster et al, 2007Foster et al, , 2013Rizeei et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods have been developed and used to identify the groundwater vulnerability in the porous aquifer. On the other hand, some methods have been proposed, i.e., EPIC [16]- [19], PI [17], APLIS [20]- [22], and COP [6], [9], [19], [23]- [25] to analyze the groundwater vulnerability in karst areas which has the typical hydrogeological condition due to the carbonate overlying rocks. According to the potentially high vulnerability of the groundwater resources, an analysis of groundwater intrinsic vulnerability in the karst area is very important to support the government in managing the land use and environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the strong hydraulic alternation conditions make this kind of water more susceptible to pollution and rapid migration, thereby posing health risks to the supply objects [5,6]. In view of the concealment of groundwater contamination and difficulty in remediation [7], prevention measures should be taken as the main means for groundwater protection when conducting industrial development, especially in karst areas [8][9][10]. Studies of heterogeneity, development degree and hydrogeochemical characteristics in typical karst aquifers can provide important information for sustainable development of groundwater and safety management of drinking groundwater sources [11,12], which is particularly important for developing the complex karst conduit systems and being the only drinking groundwater source for more than 15,000 people in the study area of this paper [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%