2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Groundwater level prediction with meteorologically sensitive Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These methods are well known as the top adaptive ones suitable for finding complex and nonlinear indefinite patterns in large dimensional data. As scientists’ skill with these AI-based systems deepens, they are becoming more dependable, and now they are frequently utilized as robust approaches in different fields of water sciences to predict complex hydraulic and hydrological variables such as sugarcane growth based on climatological parameters (Taherei Ghazvinei et al 2018 ), daily dew point temperature (Qasem et al 2019 ), forecasting nitrate concentration as a water quality parameter (Latif et al 2020 ), inflow forecasting (Latif et al 2021a ), phosphate forecasting in reservoir water system (Latif et al 2021b ), daily streamflow time-series prediction (Latif and Ahmed 2021 ; Tofiq et al 2022 ), surface water quality status and prediction during movement control operation order under COVID-19 pandemic (Najah et al 2021 ), groundwater level fluctuations (Ghasemlounia et al 2021 ; Gharehbaghi et al 2022 ), discharge coefficient of a new type of sharp-crested V-notch weirs (Gharehbaghi and Ghasemlounia 2022 ), and dissolved oxygen prediction (Ziyad Sami et al 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods are well known as the top adaptive ones suitable for finding complex and nonlinear indefinite patterns in large dimensional data. As scientists’ skill with these AI-based systems deepens, they are becoming more dependable, and now they are frequently utilized as robust approaches in different fields of water sciences to predict complex hydraulic and hydrological variables such as sugarcane growth based on climatological parameters (Taherei Ghazvinei et al 2018 ), daily dew point temperature (Qasem et al 2019 ), forecasting nitrate concentration as a water quality parameter (Latif et al 2020 ), inflow forecasting (Latif et al 2021a ), phosphate forecasting in reservoir water system (Latif et al 2021b ), daily streamflow time-series prediction (Latif and Ahmed 2021 ; Tofiq et al 2022 ), surface water quality status and prediction during movement control operation order under COVID-19 pandemic (Najah et al 2021 ), groundwater level fluctuations (Ghasemlounia et al 2021 ; Gharehbaghi et al 2022 ), discharge coefficient of a new type of sharp-crested V-notch weirs (Gharehbaghi and Ghasemlounia 2022 ), and dissolved oxygen prediction (Ziyad Sami et al 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the significant time series characteristics of climate data, LSTM has demonstrated excellent predictive performance in the field of climate change (Xing et al, 2023). Gated recurrent units (GRUs) have shown considerable performance, but their structure is simpler, and their computational speed is higher (Gao et al, 2020;Gharehbaghi et al, 2022). The hybrid CNN-GRU prediction model improves prediction accuracy and generalization ability by combining the feature expression ability of CNNs with the time series memory advantage of GRUs (Yu et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2021, Hou et al (2021b) solved the problem of temperature prediction of switchgear equipment in substation by using long short-term memory (LSTM) network, and achieved good results, which opens the prelude of solving the problem of substation equipment temperature prediction with deep learning network. The gated recurrent unit (GRU) was proposed by Gharehbaghi et al (2022) and is an effective variant of LSTM ( Cao, Jiang & Gao, 2021 ; Yuan et al, 2022 ). In many cases, GRU and LSTM have the same excellent results, but GRU has fewer parameters, so it is relatively easy to train and the over fitting problem is lighter ( Cao, Jiang & Gao, 2021 ; Yuan et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%