2018
DOI: 10.1080/14498596.2018.1429329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Groundwater extraction-induced land subsidence: a geodetic strain rate study in Kelantan, Malaysia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The negatives impact of groundwater over-exploitation is saline intrusion, streamflow depletion and land subsidence [17]. From previous research [18] its shows that Kelantan is having land subsidence with precisions of 0.12 -0.17 mm/year due to over-extractions of groundwater. In northeast Kelantan, saltwater intrusion is the most significant threat to the aquifer.…”
Section: Groundwater Over-exploitationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The negatives impact of groundwater over-exploitation is saline intrusion, streamflow depletion and land subsidence [17]. From previous research [18] its shows that Kelantan is having land subsidence with precisions of 0.12 -0.17 mm/year due to over-extractions of groundwater. In northeast Kelantan, saltwater intrusion is the most significant threat to the aquifer.…”
Section: Groundwater Over-exploitationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The use of groundwater is still common among Malaysians, especially at east coast of peninsular Malaysia, Kelantan and about 38% of the population in the State of Kelantan use groundwater for consumption (Ayob et al, 2022). Residents in the northern part of Kelantan are taking advantage of the aquifer for consuming groundwater at a high rate (4.22±0.17 mm/year) (Yong et al, 2018). The rapid growth of the population and accelerated urbanization raises demand for groundwater consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have used geodetic leveling and Global Positioning System (GPS) to detect land subsidence [ 4 , 5 ]. However, the field survey-based methods were labor-intensive and time-consuming, and thus they would be inefficient for monitoring land subsidence and its spatial distributions in large areas [ 6 , 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%