2017
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1618936114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Groundwater declines are linked to changes in Great Plains stream fish assemblages

Abstract: Groundwater pumping for agriculture is a major driver causing declines of global freshwater ecosystems, yet the ecological consequences for stream fish assemblages are rarely quantified. We combined retrospective (1950-2010) and prospective (2011-2060) modeling approaches within a multiscale framework to predict change in Great Plains stream fish assemblages associated with groundwater pumping from the United States High Plains Aquifer. We modeled the relationship between the length of stream receiving water f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
78
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
78
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Vertical connectivity between the stream channel, hyporheic zone, and shallow and major aquifers is critical for sustaining base flows in regions such as the Great Plains where groundwater contributions are essential for maintaining natural flow regimes (Dale, Zou, Andrews, Long & Liang, ; Poff, Allan & Bain, ; Sophocleous, ). Severed connectivity to local or regional aquifers caused by groundwater pumping results in population crashes and extirpations of PBS species because sufficient groundwater input is required to ensure juvenile and adult survival during harsh drought or winter conditions (Cross et al., ; Falke, Fausch, Magelky, Aldred & Durnford, ; Perkin et al., ; Pigg, ). Disconnection of surface flow from groundwater sources, together with fragmentation of longitudinal and lateral surface connectivity, is a major driver of the transformation of Great Plains stream‐fish assemblages in which PBS species disappear and remaining reproductive guilds persist and dominate (Gido et al., ; Perkin, Gido, Cooper, et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vertical connectivity between the stream channel, hyporheic zone, and shallow and major aquifers is critical for sustaining base flows in regions such as the Great Plains where groundwater contributions are essential for maintaining natural flow regimes (Dale, Zou, Andrews, Long & Liang, ; Poff, Allan & Bain, ; Sophocleous, ). Severed connectivity to local or regional aquifers caused by groundwater pumping results in population crashes and extirpations of PBS species because sufficient groundwater input is required to ensure juvenile and adult survival during harsh drought or winter conditions (Cross et al., ; Falke, Fausch, Magelky, Aldred & Durnford, ; Perkin et al., ; Pigg, ). Disconnection of surface flow from groundwater sources, together with fragmentation of longitudinal and lateral surface connectivity, is a major driver of the transformation of Great Plains stream‐fish assemblages in which PBS species disappear and remaining reproductive guilds persist and dominate (Gido et al., ; Perkin, Gido, Cooper, et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Perkin et al. ). Pollution of headwaters, including runoff of excess nutrients and other pollutants, degrades water quality affecting downstream ecosystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, most studies focus on single attributes of the groundwater regime and single GDEs (or one class of GDEs), usually water table depth and groundwater‐dependent vegetation (e.g., fens [Aldous & Bach, ] and alkali meadows [Elmore, Manning, Mustard, & Craine, ]). Modelling is often used and can combine historical and predicted data on groundwater regime to forecast changes in components of GDEs (e.g., effects of groundwater pumping from the U.S. High Plains aquifer on Great Plains stream fish assemblages; Perkin et al, ). In another example, Chan et al () used a groundwater and surface‐water hydrodynamic model that incorporated monitoring data to assess the impacts of water extraction on stream fish responses.…”
Section: The Five Steps Of Fergramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best‐studied indicators are abundance and/or condition of various groundwater‐dependent vegetation species and communities in response to altered groundwater regimes (e.g., Aldous & Bach, ; Barbeta et al, ; Brown et al, ; Eamus et al, ; Elmore et al, ). Less well studied are the potential ecological indicators in riverine and wetland GDEs; these include densities of particular groups of fish (e.g., Falke et al, ; Perkin et al, ) and macroinvertebrates (e.g., Stubbington, Wood, Reid, & Gunn, ) as well as measures of groundwater‐influenced ecosystem processes such as organic matter decomposition in the hyporheic zone (e.g., Burrows et al, ). Densities and community composition of stygofauna are commonly proposed as ecological indicators of altered groundwater regimes in cave (e.g., Chilcott, ) and aquifer GDEs (e.g., Korbel & Hose, ; Tomlinson, Boulton, Hancock, & Cook, ), although there are other potential indicators such as microbial activity (Korbel & Hose, ; Lategan, Korbel, & Hose, ).…”
Section: The Five Steps Of Fergramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation