2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grounding the right to live in the community (CRPD Article 19) in the capabilities approach to social justice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the mental health literature, families have long been viewed as important assets to promote social inclusion [ 25 ]. Yet, in common with the other studies [ 26 , 62 ], we show that whilst families do, indeed, play a major role in protecting and supporting people living with mental illness, they can also be sites of conflict, coercion, and exclusion, hindering recognition of their agency and rights [ 7 ]. Furthermore, for most families, their ability to provide adequate support was constrained by poverty and competing demands on their resources [ 25 , 62 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Within the mental health literature, families have long been viewed as important assets to promote social inclusion [ 25 ]. Yet, in common with the other studies [ 26 , 62 ], we show that whilst families do, indeed, play a major role in protecting and supporting people living with mental illness, they can also be sites of conflict, coercion, and exclusion, hindering recognition of their agency and rights [ 7 ]. Furthermore, for most families, their ability to provide adequate support was constrained by poverty and competing demands on their resources [ 25 , 62 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Importantly, this included a desire for acceptance whilst recognising that there might be ongoing needs related to the illness, or the effects of treatment. This underscores that inclusion should not be predicated on treatment and rehabilitation to remove symptoms but, as argued within the capabilities approach, requires positive action to provide opportunities and support for people to live lives they value as equal and respected members of society, regardless of disability [ 7 , 65 ]. As we have shown, what makes up this ‘good life’ is shaped by context, including gendered roles and aspirations [ 66 – 68 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While initial work was focused on women, the central list of capabilities can be adapted to fit other contexts; Nussbaum (2002) has also applied her theory to people living with disability and suggests that society should support people with disability to achieve their full potential. Indeed, Wynne Bannister and Venkatapuram (2020) argue that Article 19 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Optional Protocol (UNCRPD) (United Nations, 2006), the right to live a community as an equal member, is grounded in Nussbaum's capabilities approach. Burchardt (2004) points out that the capabilities framework is also complimentary to the social model of disability, which emphasises the need to change society (e.g.…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unique contribution of this research is in the use of the capability approach framework to theorise support services for persons with disabilities. The capability approach has been used by several disability scholars and this research adds to that existing body of research that considers the CA, a normative framework about social justice and development and about human well-being, well framed to operationalise international human rights laws such as the UNCRPD and the rights of persons with disabilities [6,12,19,20,38]. Furthermore, the CA gives an opportunity to evaluate beyond functionalities, and consider the choice of people based on their agency, which goes beyond the ICF that considers functionalities in the social context of the individual or the social model of disability that focuses on external barriers.…”
Section: Contribution Limitations and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%