Handbook of Ethnography 2001
DOI: 10.4135/9781848608337.n11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grounded Theory in Ethnography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
263
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 359 publications
(271 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
263
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Relatedly, the paradigm recognises the existence of multiple realities, the socially constructed nature of knowledge, and focuses on exploring how meaning and action are constructed (Charmaz & Mitchell, 2001). It is widely recognised that such interviews lend themselves to research questions related to human behaviour about which relatively little is known, underlying their relevance to the issue in question (Denzin, 1989;Langley, 1997;Sparkes, 2000;Strean, 1998).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatedly, the paradigm recognises the existence of multiple realities, the socially constructed nature of knowledge, and focuses on exploring how meaning and action are constructed (Charmaz & Mitchell, 2001). It is widely recognised that such interviews lend themselves to research questions related to human behaviour about which relatively little is known, underlying their relevance to the issue in question (Denzin, 1989;Langley, 1997;Sparkes, 2000;Strean, 1998).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All field notes and transcribed audio recordings were analyzed using the coding strategy articulated by Charmaz (1995), attending to the integration of ethnographic methods as recommended by Charmaz and Mitchell (2001). While the goal of this study was not the development of theory, this analysis strategy was chosen for its rigor, particularly within a design involving multiple contacts over time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the work of Nelson et al (2013), this proved to be a much messier process than is often depicted in the literature, as we at times disagreed on the utility or deployment of particular sense-making concepts. As such, some theoretical concepts were considered but ultimately rejected in terms of their explanatory utility (Charmaz & Mitchell, 2001;Tracy, 2013;Wolcott, 2005). We did, however, reach a consensus in terms of the interpretation of Maeve's experiences that is offered in this paper.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%