2003
DOI: 10.1097/00012272-200301000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grounded Theory, Feminist Theory, Critical Theory

Abstract: Nursing and social science scholars have examined the compatibility between feminist and grounded theory traditions in scientific knowledge generation, concluding that they are complementary, yet not without certain tensions. This line of inquiry is extended to propose a critical feminist grounded theory methodology. The construction of symbolic interactionist, feminist, and critical feminist variants of grounded theory methodology is examined in terms of the presuppositions of each tradition and their interpl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…METHOD Methodologic strategies in this study included multiple methods of data generation, specifically individual and focus group interviews and policy and media documents, which are consistent with the perspectives of critical and institutional ethnography (Carspecken, 1996;Smith, 1987). The research engaged theoretical triangulation among critical, feminist, and symbolic interactionist perspectives (Kushner & Morrow, 2003). The perspectives are understood to be complementary in their philosophic assumptions and mutually corrective compared with each perspective taken.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…METHOD Methodologic strategies in this study included multiple methods of data generation, specifically individual and focus group interviews and policy and media documents, which are consistent with the perspectives of critical and institutional ethnography (Carspecken, 1996;Smith, 1987). The research engaged theoretical triangulation among critical, feminist, and symbolic interactionist perspectives (Kushner & Morrow, 2003). The perspectives are understood to be complementary in their philosophic assumptions and mutually corrective compared with each perspective taken.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This framework was considered particularly appropriate for a study area about which little is known because it provided the researcher with the very strategies to build theoretical propositions about an under-explored area of inquiry [14]. The focus under consideration here is how frail elders come to use day care services in Taiwan.…”
Section: Methodsology and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is a narrative inquiry informed by the theoretical triangulation of critical, feminist, and symbolic interactionist ontology and epistemology (Kushner & Morrow, 2003: Pitre, Kushner, Raine, & Hegadoren, 2013. This sociological, critical feminist approach to narrative inquiry is designed to explore the symbolic, historical, structural, and ideological forces and conditions that interact with and influence participants' agency, identity, reflexivity, and voice as told within the stories that they share during one or more interviews (Pitre et al, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%