1990
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(1990)116:4(484)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground‐Water‐Management Areas in United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, Bowman's [1990] survey of groundwater policy in the U.S. identified only twenty states in which governments even collect information on water use, either by metering or self-reporting, and fewer yet that place any quantitative controls on amounts withdrawn. For correct damage assessment, a pumper withdrawing an acre foot of water must be liable for damages equal to the present value of all future pumping cost increases imposed on other users-and the charge must be assessed on each acre foot withdrawn.…”
Section: Examples and Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By contrast, Bowman's [1990] survey of groundwater policy in the U.S. identified only twenty states in which governments even collect information on water use, either by metering or self-reporting, and fewer yet that place any quantitative controls on amounts withdrawn. For correct damage assessment, a pumper withdrawing an acre foot of water must be liable for damages equal to the present value of all future pumping cost increases imposed on other users-and the charge must be assessed on each acre foot withdrawn.…”
Section: Examples and Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a minimum this would require knowledge of how much is withdrawn by individual users. By contrast, Bowman's [1990] survey of groundwater policy in the U.S. identified only twenty states in which governments even collect information on water use, either by metering or self-reporting, and fewer yet that place any quantitative controls on amounts withdrawn. Absent quantitative limits on amounts used or accurate damage assessments, the value of groundwater in situ will not be a part of the opportunity cost faced by the individual user.…”
Section: Examples and Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many states have established special groundwater management areas to provide a structure for managing withdrawals in areas of active development [Bowman, 1990] In 1989, Oregon enacted legislation providing for two types of groundwater quality-related management areas. An "area of groundwater concern" may be declared when testing indicates the presence of groundwater contaminants suspected to be from nonpoint sources.…”
Section: Special Management Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Institutions and instruments for groundwater management accrue over time. Frequently, groundwater management starts with instruments aimed at individual wells, such as spacing or wellhead protection and, as groundwater concerns expand or change, additional instruments are used (Bowman 1990; MacDonnell and Guy 1991). Due to the evolving nature of groundwater management, multiple institutions and instruments for groundwater management exist concurrently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%