2018
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2018.2871556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground Target Classification in Noisy SAR Images Using Convolutional Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is difficult to manually design effective features for SAR image target recognition. Different from the traditional automatic target recognition technology based on artificial design features [7], [8], deep neural networks, especially convolutional neural networks (CNNs), can automatically learn target features for automatic target recognition [9], which reduces the computational cost and improves the recognition accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is difficult to manually design effective features for SAR image target recognition. Different from the traditional automatic target recognition technology based on artificial design features [7], [8], deep neural networks, especially convolutional neural networks (CNNs), can automatically learn target features for automatic target recognition [9], which reduces the computational cost and improves the recognition accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Shao et al [10] analyzed and compared the performance of different CNNs on the MSTAR [11] dataset based on accuracy, number of parameters, training time and other metrics to verify the superiority of CNNs for SAR image target recognition. Wang et al [12] proposed despeckling and classification coupled CNNs to distinguish multiple categories of ground targets in SAR images with strong and varying speckle. Shang et al [13] proposed deep memory convolution neural networks to alleviate the problem of overfitting caused by insufficient SAR image samples, and their method achieved higher accuracy than several other well-known SAR image classification algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used the VGG-16 architecture pre-trained on the Imagenet dataset for the feature extraction. Also, a more noise resistant approach was adopted by Wang et al [20] by utilizing despeckling and classification coupled CNNs (DCC-CNN) to distinguish different classes of targets in SAR images that have strong and varying speckles and a detailed analysis was performed. Figure 1 demonstrates the step by step approach taken.…”
Section: Sar Image Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CNNs have shown its great superiority in various image processing, e.g. optical images [17], medical images [18], [19], synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images [20], etc. Therefore, researchers begin to apply deep learning methods to the classification task of LiDAR data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%