2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2022.04.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground surface detection method using ground penetrating radar signal for sugarcane harvester base-cutter control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the GPR also being pushed at the other area such as road shoulder which is cover by the uneven surface such as gravel. Besides the impact of the physical antenna as described before, [11] stated that the irregular surface induced different travel times, thus resulting in scattering that is exhibited in a hyperbolic pattern. The interaction between the antenna system and the ground, such as shields and support structures, causes changes in antenna characteristics [6].…”
Section: Ground Coupled Antennamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thus, the GPR also being pushed at the other area such as road shoulder which is cover by the uneven surface such as gravel. Besides the impact of the physical antenna as described before, [11] stated that the irregular surface induced different travel times, thus resulting in scattering that is exhibited in a hyperbolic pattern. The interaction between the antenna system and the ground, such as shields and support structures, causes changes in antenna characteristics [6].…”
Section: Ground Coupled Antennamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the sugarcane production cycle, mechanization facilitates soil tillage, crop management and harvesting processes. However, it can also have negative consequences when misused, e.g., it can damage stalks and harm the soil [27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Digitalization and Transformation In Agriculturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical process of harvesting sugarcane can result in losses, primarily because of factors such as operator oversight, variations in terrain and soil conditions, the composition of the cane, harvester speed and cutting set [95]. Given that the cutting mechanism of the harvester plays a significant role in determining the quality of the harvest, numerous studies have been conducted on this aspect [31,93,[96][97][98][99], but despite these efforts, limited studies have attempted to make real-time diagnosis on the cutting blade conditions.…”
Section: Digital Solutions In Sugarcane Mechanizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the analysis of introduction, it is clear that the non-contact perception mode is not ideal for dealing with disturbances. In the future, if there are non-contact methods with application value to sugarcane harvesting, such as image recognition technology with complex background features or electromagnetic wave technology penetrating interferents [34], it can be our next research goal. However, at this stage, unless the sugarcane harvesting process is reformed, although the uncertainty in the practical application of contact methods is much more difficult than that of non-contact methods, according to our experimental analysis, Suomi et al also confirmed that the contact measurement method is a more suitable solution for the analysis of the tillage depth test of the planter [16].…”
Section: Regression Analysis Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%