2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2019.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground support design for dynamic loading conditions: A quantitative data-driven approach based on rockburst case studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Steel mesh is easily damaged by the impact of blasting and cleaning operations, so it is difficult to design a stronger and permanent regional support system with large coverage, while it will also lead to the failure of regional support and single yield support to form an integrated system. Malan et al deemed that a possible solution is the use of reef boring techniques, where the reef is drilled out by boring machines from predeveloped access drives while removing miners from the hazardous stope faces [193].…”
Section: Rockburst Prevention and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Steel mesh is easily damaged by the impact of blasting and cleaning operations, so it is difficult to design a stronger and permanent regional support system with large coverage, while it will also lead to the failure of regional support and single yield support to form an integrated system. Malan et al deemed that a possible solution is the use of reef boring techniques, where the reef is drilled out by boring machines from predeveloped access drives while removing miners from the hazardous stope faces [193].…”
Section: Rockburst Prevention and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morissette et al used the seismic events and rockburst events of three deep mines in the Sudbury basin of Canada to establish a comprehensive database and proposed a database-based support design strategy to determine the mine location for enhanced support, the time for dynamic support installation and selection of the appropriate surrounding rock support system [193].…”
Section: Rockburst Prevention and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-term measurements include understanding the changes in the mine to adapt the exploitation methods and improve mine design (Heal, 2010) for reducing the hazard due to rockbursting. Some short-term measurements include the installation of ground support systems to reinforce the structures absorbing the kinetic energy released (Morissette and Hadjigeorgiou, 2019) or the use of remotely operated equipment. For all approaches, it is vital to understand the seismicity of the mine; therefore, microseismic monitoring is the main method for underground mining hazard.…”
Section: Rockbursts Hazardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a number of scholars conducted drop tests and simulated rockburst experiments using blasting tests to focus on the support performance of integrated support systems (Ortlepp and Stacey 1998;Stacey and Ortlepp 2001;Potvin 2007, 2011;Heal 2010;Bucher et al 2013;Br盲ndle et al 2017). The support capacities of various ground support systems are also evaluated and rated in burst-prone mines to provide empirical guidance in ground support selection (Heal et al 2006;Potvin 2009;Mikula 2012;Duan et al 2015a;NGI 2015;Morissette and Hadjigeorgiou 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%