1969
DOI: 10.1021/ja01032a001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground states of conjugated molecules. XI. Improved treatment of hydrocarbons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

16
251
1
5

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 490 publications
(273 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
16
251
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Since each bond in VB is described by a singlet coupled pair of orbitals, the reference points 1,3,5-cyclohexatriene in the benzene geometry (D 6h symmetry) and in its optimized geometry (D 3h symmetry) with double bonds between the carbonatoms (1,2), (3,4) and (5,6), is described by the following wavefunction:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since each bond in VB is described by a singlet coupled pair of orbitals, the reference points 1,3,5-cyclohexatriene in the benzene geometry (D 6h symmetry) and in its optimized geometry (D 3h symmetry) with double bonds between the carbonatoms (1,2), (3,4) and (5,6), is described by the following wavefunction:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 1,3,5-cyclohexatriene as such does not exist, it was proposed to compare the energy of benzene with that of a polyene-like 1,3,5-cyclohexatriene with D 3h symmetry [4]. In this case also a change in geometry ðD 6h !…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…benzene, compared to their non-aromatic counterparts is a subject of considerable interest in chemistry. Many approaches for its calculation have been suggested in the literature, both empirical [1][2][3] and employing Ab Initio quantum chemistry [4][5][6][7][8]. Historically, Pauling and Wheland [9] have defined the resonance energy of an aromatic compound as the difference in energy between the resonating multi-structure valence bond wave function and the lowest contributing structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, it shows a minimum between 1.52 and 1.53 Å, which agrees well with the expected equilibrium bond length for a σ bond between two sp 2 carbon atoms. 62 In comparison, the corresponding triplet state in the two-electron system of H 2 is purely repulsive since the underlying potential is just the repulsion between the bare nuclei. In semiempirical applications of the Hubbard model, the underlying bond potential is most often modeled as a spring, in other words as a harmonic expansion about a minimum.…”
Section: The V C Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%