2008
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.77.033804
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground-state cooling of a micromechanical oscillator: Comparing cold damping and cavity-assisted cooling schemes

Abstract: We provide a general framework to describe cooling of a micromechanical oscillator to its quantum ground state by means of radiation-pressure coupling with a driven optical cavity. We apply it to two experimentally realized schemes, back-action cooling via a detuned cavity and cold-damping quantum-feedback cooling, and we determine the ultimate quantum limits of both schemes for the full parameter range of a stable cavity. While both allow to reach the oscillator's quantum ground state, we find that back-actio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
432
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 548 publications
(447 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
14
432
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(20,21). In these quadratures, the amplifier equations can be written as (dropping here the added-noise terms)…”
Section: Amplificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(20,21). In these quadratures, the amplifier equations can be written as (dropping here the added-noise terms)…”
Section: Amplificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9]). Considering a thermally populated bath, the noise spectrum assumes the form [8] S ξ (ω) = γ m ω ω m coth ω kT + 1…”
Section: Noise: Input Field Correlators and The Quantum Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This class of models with photon number -mirror displacement (Nx) type of coupling used for mirror-photon entanglement [52], entanglement cooling of a mirror [53] and entanglement of test masses and standard quantum limit [54] is very different from the class with bilinear coupling in QBM studies (Beware of inconsistencies in the usual master equations for this problem, see [55]). …”
Section: B Decoherence and Disentanglementmentioning
confidence: 99%