SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2020 2020
DOI: 10.1190/segam2020-3405908.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground-roll attenuation through quaternionic inversion with sparsity constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because ground roll is slow, it is often spatially aliased, complicating subsequent processing efforts to remove this coherent noise component with f − k or Radon filtering [Yilmaz, 2001, Trad et al [2003]. Unfortunately, it is financially unfeasible to decrease the periodic receiver sampling interval to avoid aliasing [Bahia et al, 2020], and we have to resort to alternative randomized acquisition methodologies [Mosher et al, 2014] that are in principle conducive to in silico unaliased wavefield reconstruction. While this has proven to work, the presence of strong-amplitude ground roll complicates wavefield reconstruction.…”
Section: Impact Of Ground Rollmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because ground roll is slow, it is often spatially aliased, complicating subsequent processing efforts to remove this coherent noise component with f − k or Radon filtering [Yilmaz, 2001, Trad et al [2003]. Unfortunately, it is financially unfeasible to decrease the periodic receiver sampling interval to avoid aliasing [Bahia et al, 2020], and we have to resort to alternative randomized acquisition methodologies [Mosher et al, 2014] that are in principle conducive to in silico unaliased wavefield reconstruction. While this has proven to work, the presence of strong-amplitude ground roll complicates wavefield reconstruction.…”
Section: Impact Of Ground Rollmentioning
confidence: 99%