2005
DOI: 10.1117/12.618185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground-reference calibration results for Landsat-7 ETM+

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most current laboratory panel measurement uncertainty estimates have been updated to be ±1.0%-1.4% throughout most of the VNIR and SWIR regions [19]. The reflectance-based uncertainty table in [36] has been updated with the new panel uncertainty values, and the new results are shown in Table 6. Assuming an average panel BRF measurement uncertainty of ±1.3% over the VNIR and SWIR, the current uncertainty in the TOA spectral radiance is ±2.6% in the middle of the visible spectral region.…”
Section: Reflectance-based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The most current laboratory panel measurement uncertainty estimates have been updated to be ±1.0%-1.4% throughout most of the VNIR and SWIR regions [19]. The reflectance-based uncertainty table in [36] has been updated with the new panel uncertainty values, and the new results are shown in Table 6. Assuming an average panel BRF measurement uncertainty of ±1.3% over the VNIR and SWIR, the current uncertainty in the TOA spectral radiance is ±2.6% in the middle of the visible spectral region.…”
Section: Reflectance-based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early work showed that the reflectance-based approach had an absolute radiometric uncertainty of ±5%, and estimated that improvements should result in an uncertainty of ±3% in the middle of the visible portion of the spectrum [12,22,35]. More recently, the uncertainty was re-evaluated to include updates to the surface reflectance retrieval, which is typically the primary source of uncertainty in the reflectance-based approach [36]. The uncertainty of the reflectance-based approach was determined to be 2.5%.…”
Section: Reflectance-based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2,4 Ground-based vicarious methods are also being used to validate the radiometric calibration of OLI, 5 and the techniques used to perform this work are based on a long heritage of in situ measurements for the purpose of the radiometric calibration of airborne and spaceborne sensors including Landsat 4 and Landsat 5. [6][7][8] This work expands the time period of earlier work that evaluated the radiometric performance of OLI during the commissioning phase, which was 30-90 days after launch. This work is similar to the early OLI work, in that it uses the reflectance-based technique and it also includes results obtained using RadCaTS, which is an automated facility at Railroad Valley, Nevada, USA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The atmospheric aerosol loading is generally low throughout much of the year, with an average aerosol optical depth of 0.060 at 550 nm. 23 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%