2017 International Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Symposium - Italy (ACES) 2017
DOI: 10.23919/ropaces.2017.7916395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground penetrating radar data imaging via Kirchhoff migration method

Abstract: Abstract-In this paper the imaging of Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) scenario via Kirchhoff migration (KM) method is seen as a validation of the controlled experimental data and as a first step toward more elaborate imaging techniques. One of our goals is to have the possibility to acquire experimental data in a controlled laboratory environment. The bi-static GPR data is then acquired and validated by comparison with electromagnetic simulation. The imaging process is obtained using either the total field or t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The techniques considered in this study were the following: Stripmap Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), Kirchhoff Migration (KM) and Frequency Wavenumber (FK). The techniques in question were subsequently implemented and used in focusing the GPR images collected during the measurement campaign in the reference church (Liu, Serhir, Kameni, Lambert, & Pichon, 2017).…”
Section: Migration Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The techniques considered in this study were the following: Stripmap Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), Kirchhoff Migration (KM) and Frequency Wavenumber (FK). The techniques in question were subsequently implemented and used in focusing the GPR images collected during the measurement campaign in the reference church (Liu, Serhir, Kameni, Lambert, & Pichon, 2017).…”
Section: Migration Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kirchhoff migration method [7] is first introduced in 1970s, [8] tests Kirchhoff migration method by using both synthetic and real GPR data, the results show that though the localization of the buried targets could be achieved, the information about target shape and extension are not provided by implementing this method. In the meanwhile, [9] represents that Kirchhoff migration method is capable to focus on the target position, however, it's processing speed is slower than the rest of migration approaches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods are known to provide good results to reconstruct the shapes and locations of unknown inhomogeneities when using enough incident fields [10,11,12,13], but might fail when not as exemplified in [12]. Practically speaking, retrieving the information about the inhomogeneities with only a few number of incident fields is an important issue for various applications such as Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imaging [14,15,16,17] and Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) [18,19,20], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where α := max {α m , m = 1, 2 • • • , M } for a generic incident field E i ∞ (r m ,ŷ). Introducing the far-field pattern of the dyadic Green function (16) and the expression of plane wave field due to the dipole (17) in (19) leads to…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%