2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2020.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground movements modeling applying adjusted influence function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a computational experiment, a geometric-integral model based on the Knothe-Budryk theory was used [15,84,85]. The displacement field theoretical values for a rectangular disturbance located at a depth of 800 m with dimensions of 1500 m × 900 m were calculated to reflect local mining and geological conditions.…”
Section: Study Area and Input Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a computational experiment, a geometric-integral model based on the Knothe-Budryk theory was used [15,84,85]. The displacement field theoretical values for a rectangular disturbance located at a depth of 800 m with dimensions of 1500 m × 900 m were calculated to reflect local mining and geological conditions.…”
Section: Study Area and Input Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repeating the process described above produces ground subsidence predictions for each extraction element within the calculation area; the sum of each of the extraction element-induced ground subsidences is the final subsidence prediction induced by the extraction of the mining area. Note that, although the summation method is comparatively simple in terms of the subsidence calculating process and the algorithm implemented [19], the data processing results show that the calculation accuracy of the summation method is inferior to that of the Monte Carlo integration method if the number of divided triangular extraction elements is equal. In addition, in order to Note that the Monte Carlo integration method-based ratio estimation of n E to n A is guaranteed to converge with the in-situ ratio of V E to V A when the number of rolling points increases to infinity [35].…”
Section: Extraction Element-induced Subsidence Prediction Based On Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flowchart of the Monte Carlo method-based subsidence prediction for a given extraction element is shown in Figure 8, and the corresponding algorithm can be described as follows: Repeating the process described above produces ground subsidence predictions for each extraction element within the calculation area; the sum of each of the extraction element-induced ground subsidences is the final subsidence prediction induced by the extraction of the mining area. Note that, although the summation method is comparatively simple in terms of the subsidence calculating process and the algorithm implemented [19], the data processing results show that the calculation accuracy of the summation method is inferior to that of the Monte Carlo integration method if the number of divided triangular extraction elements is equal. In addition, in order to Figure 8.…”
Section: Extraction Element-induced Subsidence Prediction Based On Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations