2023
DOI: 10.1177/87552930221144330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground motion model for Peninsular India using an artificial neural network

Abstract: Ground motion models (GMMs) are an essential tool for seismic hazard analysis. They are used for developing predictive relationships to estimate the expected levels of seismic ground shaking through the ground motion parameters (GMPs). There is limited recorded data on the stable continental regions (SCR) such as Peninsular India (PI), and Central and North Eastern America (CENA), and GMMs are developed either by hybrid or stochastic methods. In this study, an effort has been made to develop a GMM for the PI r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Including NESS data is particularly beneficial due to its repository of near-field ground motion records from large seismic events, thus widening the dataset's scope (Meenakshi et al, 2023;Podili and Raghukanth, 2023). We have found that the model predictions are comparable with other vertical GMMs without bias.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Including NESS data is particularly beneficial due to its repository of near-field ground motion records from large seismic events, thus widening the dataset's scope (Meenakshi et al, 2023;Podili and Raghukanth, 2023). We have found that the model predictions are comparable with other vertical GMMs without bias.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In addition to EQ detection, other factors like PGA, peak ground velocity (PGV), peak ground displacement (PGD), and active tectonics play crucial roles in assessing seismic hazards [53][54][55][56]. Various studies have employed ML models to predict these parameters [57]. For instance, Yao et al [36] used DL models to evaluate PGA predictions for dynamic rupture scenarios.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, the PSA is further compared with the global GMMs that are developed for the NGA-East project along with the results of NGA-East GMM tool provided by the PEER group and Meenakshi et al 35 Predictions of PSA from those global GMMs are obtained from the electronic appendices of the PEER project. The global GMMs are developed for rock site conditions Class A type with V s 30-3000 m/s.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both GMMs are developed using ANN. Further, the residuals are decomposed into between-event, site-to-site, and within-event-single-site residuals using the linear mixed effects method by following a similar procedure provided by Khosravikia et al 36 and Meenakshi et al 35 Further, the developed networks are verified by checking whether the residuals depict any bias against the predictor variables such as M w , R rup , and V s 30. The performance analysis and the parametric study have also been presented to confirm the efficacy of the developed GMMs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation