2020
DOI: 10.1080/14888386.2020.1831605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground-dwelling spiders in agroecosystems of the Dry Chaco: a rapid assessment of community shifts in response to land use changes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
3
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with reports on other arid and semi-arid environments in Argentina, the arachnid assemblage in northeastern Patagonia was dominated by species of Philodromidae, Gnaphosidae, and Zodariidae [58][59][60][61][62]. Unlike other local studies that include arachnids as part of the ground-dwelling arthropod assemblages [40,63], this work found a low relative abundance of wolf spiders (Lycosidae).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In agreement with reports on other arid and semi-arid environments in Argentina, the arachnid assemblage in northeastern Patagonia was dominated by species of Philodromidae, Gnaphosidae, and Zodariidae [58][59][60][61][62]. Unlike other local studies that include arachnids as part of the ground-dwelling arthropod assemblages [40,63], this work found a low relative abundance of wolf spiders (Lycosidae).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This could explain the inconsistencies between the current study, based on a high-severity fire, and the results of Pompozzi et al [61]. Finally, L. birabeni has been found to be sensitive to other anthropogenic disturbances such as grazing and agriculture in different areas in Argentina [58,69]. Thus, it could be a useful species for monitoring the response of local biological communities to different types of disturbances.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With this method, spiders, at the species or family level, have been assessed as indicators of different groups. For example, habitat (Ghione et al 2013;Aisen et al 2017;Quijano-Cuervo et al 2019), habitat in a gradient of disturbance (Kaltsas et al 2014;Argañaraz et al 2020a; van Rensburg et al 2020), management (Torma et al 2019;Argañaraz et al 2020b;Topa et al 2021), succession and restoration (Cristofoli et al 2010;Malumbres-Olarte et al 2013;Yekwayo et al 2019), pollution (Horváth et al 2001;Nahmani et al 2006), soil quality (Nuria et al 2011;Rousseau et al 2013), colonization of agroecosystems (Royauté and Buddle 2012), forest fragmentation and degradation (do Amaral Nogueira and Pintoda-Rocha 2016), seasons (Campuzano and Padilla-Ramírez 2021) and ecosystem services (Elie et al 2018). However, the majority of the research mentioned was carried out in non-South American countries.…”
Section: ₁₁₂₁ I�����������mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the majority of the research mentioned was carried out in non-South American countries. In Argentina, there is an information gap related to this subject as the only studies carried out in this country were those conducted by Aisen et al (2017), Argañaraz et al (2020aArgañaraz et al ( , 2020b, and Martínez et al (2022). Besides, such investigations have been conducted using only soil-dwellers spiders, which are also commonly used in other countries.…”
Section: ₁₁₂₁ I�����������mentioning
confidence: 99%