2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-44832-8_64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground-Borne Vibration Mitigation Measures for Turnouts: State-of-the-Art and Field Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some cases, the results using the grillage beam method seem to have discrepancies with the field observations where the maximum bending and shear forces were evident within the crossing panel [16][17][18][19]. A number of researches have been conducted to locate the critical section within a turnout, and many of which conclude that the critical section is located specifically at the crossing panel [20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Finite Element (Fe) Modellingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In some cases, the results using the grillage beam method seem to have discrepancies with the field observations where the maximum bending and shear forces were evident within the crossing panel [16][17][18][19]. A number of researches have been conducted to locate the critical section within a turnout, and many of which conclude that the critical section is located specifically at the crossing panel [20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Finite Element (Fe) Modellingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In order to reduce the excessive levels of vibration that may be generated at railway crossings several empirical mitigation strategies have been proposed based on improved crossing designs [1], or installing vibration abatement measures on the track [2,3]. Although the prediction of ground-borne vibration due to railway crossings is important for identifying ways to tackle unacceptable levels of vibration from existing as well as future railway lines, most studies that address wheel-rail interaction for complex rail profiles such as the crossing rail geometry are only focused on the prediction of wear and rolling-contact fatigue, rather than ground vibration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%