“…However, the high gas concentrations and limited atmospheric entrainment in young, proximal plumes yield high quality data that record faithfully primary degassing processes at a temporal resolution approaching that of geophysical data (≤1 Hz). Remote measurements, such as can be acquired using imaging or spectral techniques (e.g., UV/IR‐cameras and COSPEC/scanning‐differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS)/FlySpec/mobile‐DOAS, respectively), are typically performed several kilometers from the volcanic gas source and therefore pose little to no direct risk to volcanologists or equipment (e.g., Bluth et al, ; Edmonds et al, ; Galle et al, ; Holland et al, ; Horton et al, ; McGonigle et al, , ; Moffat & Millan, ; Mori & Burton, ; Oppenheimer et al, ; Platt et al, ; Tamburello et al, , ; Weibring et al, ; Wilkes et al, ). Note that, although significant progress has been made in the use of Light Detection And Ranging (LIDAR) for remote sensing of CO 2 (Santoro et al, ), SO 2 is currently the only gas species able to be measured routinely by remote methods due to its strong absorption at UV wavelengths and the negligible concentration in ambient air.…”