2018
DOI: 10.3390/geosciences8020044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground-Based Remote Sensing and Imaging of Volcanic Gases and Quantitative Determination of Multi-Species Emission Fluxes

Abstract: The physical and chemical structure and the spatial evolution of volcanic plumes are of great interest since they influence the Earth's atmospheric composition and the climate. Equally important is the monitoring of the abundance and emission patterns of volcanic gases, which gives insight into processes in the Earth's interior that are difficult to access otherwise. Here, we review spectroscopic approaches (from ultraviolet to thermal infra-red) to determine multi-species emissions and to quantify gas fluxes.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gradients in the BrO distributions can give insight into in-plume halogen chemistry (see e.g. Bobrowski et al, 2007;von Glasow, 2010;Roberts et al, 2014). The NO 2 scenario (blue spectral range) is applicable to measurements of stack emissions at, for example, a coal power plant (see e.g.…”
Section: Detection Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gradients in the BrO distributions can give insight into in-plume halogen chemistry (see e.g. Bobrowski et al, 2007;von Glasow, 2010;Roberts et al, 2014). The NO 2 scenario (blue spectral range) is applicable to measurements of stack emissions at, for example, a coal power plant (see e.g.…”
Section: Detection Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…SO 2 camera, ∼ 1 Hz for volcanic emissions; see e.g. Mori and Burton, 2006;Bluth et al, 2007;Kern et al, 2010;Platt et al, 2018) or a tuneable BPF as a wavelength selective element (e.g. NO 2 camera, ∼ 3 min per image for stack emissions of power plants; Dekemper et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the high gas concentrations and limited atmospheric entrainment in young, proximal plumes yield high quality data that record faithfully primary degassing processes at a temporal resolution approaching that of geophysical data (≤1 Hz). Remote measurements, such as can be acquired using imaging or spectral techniques (e.g., UV/IR‐cameras and COSPEC/scanning‐differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS)/FlySpec/mobile‐DOAS, respectively), are typically performed several kilometers from the volcanic gas source and therefore pose little to no direct risk to volcanologists or equipment (e.g., Bluth et al, ; Edmonds et al, ; Galle et al, ; Holland et al, ; Horton et al, ; McGonigle et al, , ; Moffat & Millan, ; Mori & Burton, ; Oppenheimer et al, ; Platt et al, ; Tamburello et al, , ; Weibring et al, ; Wilkes et al, ). Note that, although significant progress has been made in the use of Light Detection And Ranging (LIDAR) for remote sensing of CO 2 (Santoro et al, ), SO 2 is currently the only gas species able to be measured routinely by remote methods due to its strong absorption at UV wavelengths and the negligible concentration in ambient air.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies of this kind, SO 2 is one of the most prominent gases to measure. Beside the dependence of its gas fraction and emission rate on sub surface magmatic processes, it features properties like a high abundance in volcanic plumes, a low atmospheric background, a relatively long (typically days) atmospheric lifetime and favorable optical absorption properties, which make it easy to detect and an excellent plume tracer (Caroll and Holloway, 1994;Oppenheimer et al, 2011;Platt et al, 2018). Remote sensing of SO 2 has become well-established among volcanologists to determine abundance and total emission rate from safe distance and at low logistic effort (e.g., Moffat and Millan, 1971;Oppenheimer et al, 1998;Galle et al, 2003;Horton et al, 2006;Mori and Burton, 2006), however, its in-situ detection remains a crucial complemental tool, e.g., to achieve high spatial resolution or more accurate measurements and for the validation of remote sensing instruments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%